User talk:DBZROCKS/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:DBZROCKS. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
February-March 2007 |
Goku Image
I don't know what happened to it, but I'm thinking about reverting because I hate that pic. I actually uploaded a pic of him from the last episode of GT (even though I hate GT, but it's a good pic) that I like even better then the one that we had on the article. Not to mention the one that we had on the article is tagged to be deleted because it doesn't have a fair use policy. I have never liked the one that we had on the article, I think it is a horrible picture. I've tried changing it numerous times, but SUIT usually reverts. I'm thinking about reverting it right now, but there seems to be an edit war starting. What do you think? --Majinvegeta 00:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with what you said (on my talk page) because the orange Gi is what he is typically seen in, but that doesn't mean that it's a good pic, but I believe that a pic that shows his face good is more important then the attire he's wearing. The problem with Wikipedia is that it's so hard to license a pic for usage on an article. There's so many things you need to do, and now the pic I uploaded is supposedly "unlicensed" for usage on Wikipedia, even though I provided a fair use rationale. Excuse the language, but this site is seriously a pain in the ass sometimes. --Majinvegeta 00:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry to butt in: it was my fault too for helping Kayla decide on a better quality image. The image of Goku in the orange dōgi lacked quality, or so we thought, a better pic would've sufficed. Ya gotta admit though, isn't the current image kinda... wierd? I mean, isn't there one where he isn't "dead", but is still in his orange dōgi? DBZROCKS, if you got a better one, upload it and I'll provide a fair use rationale among other things. Peace — ~I'm anonymous
- You really think so? Well, you sure you don't have a better quality one? ~I'm anonymous
- I received your message. When you wanna show an image on a user page or talk page, make sure you place a colon after the first two brackets like so: [[:Image:Name.jpg|thumb|Name]]. I've read that there's a WP:FAIRUSE policy regarding this — just lettin ya know. ~I'm anonymous
- You really think so? Well, you sure you don't have a better quality one? ~I'm anonymous
- Sorry to butt in: it was my fault too for helping Kayla decide on a better quality image. The image of Goku in the orange dōgi lacked quality, or so we thought, a better pic would've sufficed. Ya gotta admit though, isn't the current image kinda... wierd? I mean, isn't there one where he isn't "dead", but is still in his orange dōgi? DBZROCKS, if you got a better one, upload it and I'll provide a fair use rationale among other things. Peace — ~I'm anonymous
- I agree with what you said (on my talk page) because the orange Gi is what he is typically seen in, but that doesn't mean that it's a good pic, but I believe that a pic that shows his face good is more important then the attire he's wearing. The problem with Wikipedia is that it's so hard to license a pic for usage on an article. There's so many things you need to do, and now the pic I uploaded is supposedly "unlicensed" for usage on Wikipedia, even though I provided a fair use rationale. Excuse the language, but this site is seriously a pain in the ass sometimes. --Majinvegeta 00:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Vegeta
Man I think I am done with the article. It feel I have done all I could for it. So go ahead and see if they like it and give it a good article review. My next target will be M. Trunks. Heat P 03:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Birthday
Is today really your birthday? --24.136.230.38 12:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday! | ||
Have a wonderful happy birthday! I think you deserve some gifts! From 24.136.230.38 12:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC) |
Brace for old age.
Re: About your Wikiproject membership
Thanks for the intro. Though to be frank, I was kind of obligated to join; I did so because Kayla (User:Majinvegeta) placed a DB WikiProject template on my user page. She and SUIT said to me that anyone can join without the need of the admin. authorizing the user. So, here I am! Oh, do you happen to edit the Dragon Ball wikia? I have an idea... ~I'm anonymous
- So, you haven't created an account at the DB wiki as of yet? ~I'm anonymous
- {sighs}: If only the site didn't suck so much in appearance, DB fans would edit it more often. Agree? ~I'm anonymous
- I got your message regarding the recent vandals. Those Sonic related accounts have been blocked indef., but what's up with User:Recoome? Has he been involved in sockpuppetry also? Actually, what is that supposed to mean? Recoome was active at the DragonBall wiki but then he lefted, apparently. What's going on? ~I'm anonymous
- You're probably unsure of how to answer, huh? ~I'm anonymous
- About the Yamcha move, I need you to comment with your yes or no there and explain, no offense. User:Fuad Ramses was the one who brought up the idea on a discussion once posted. Still, can't you see the true name? No one ever pronounces it YAM-CHA (not counting the dubs) his name is YAM-MU-CHA. We're using romanizations, right? Alas, that's what I've been told. So, can ya post your thoughts there? ~I'm anonymous
- You're probably unsure of how to answer, huh? ~I'm anonymous
- I got your message regarding the recent vandals. Those Sonic related accounts have been blocked indef., but what's up with User:Recoome? Has he been involved in sockpuppetry also? Actually, what is that supposed to mean? Recoome was active at the DragonBall wiki but then he lefted, apparently. What's going on? ~I'm anonymous
- {sighs}: If only the site didn't suck so much in appearance, DB fans would edit it more often. Agree? ~I'm anonymous
Thanks. Let's see what others think, okay? ~I'm anonymous
"Edit count"
You have {{User 10 000e}} on your user page, but have only around 1,000 edits. Just letting you know. --Phoenix (talk) 04:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Woops my bad its fixed now. DBZROCKS 12:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Malamockq's May 2007 Comments
Please be civil
You wrote, "Geez when I said dig it up on the talk page I didn't think you'd acctually do it."
Don't leave comments like that on the talk pages please. Malamockq 16:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Deletion of comments
Do not restore those comments. They weren't directly inflamatory, but they were rude, and incite flames. Hence a form of trolling. I already warned him, and told him he was free to repost his opinion in a civil manner. Please do not revert the deletion. Malamockq 21:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- You can't go around deleting peoples comments just because you don't like them. No is not trolling. the third comment may not of been exactally apropriate but it doesn't give you a right to delete it. Unless Dark Dragon Flame specifically attacks you than you can't delete it. DBZROCKS 21:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not be unhelpful
You seem to be criticising me for creating that discussion on bringing back King Kold's article, when it was in fact your idea to begin with. Why are you contradicting yourself like that? To say the least, it's very unhelpful. Malamockq 22:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I did not say go to the wikiproject Dragon Ball talk page to further the discussion I ment to go there if you wanted to talk about any other redirects that you think are unfair in the future. DBZROCKS 22:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- We can deduce two things. What you said was not phrased correctly, and what you meant was not relevant to my changes. Malamockq 22:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- ? What? DBZROCKS 22:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- We can deduce two things. What you said was not phrased correctly, and what you meant was not relevant to my changes. Malamockq 22:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
These two...
These are the two users from my school who are likely to be vandals:
They don't use their user names much though, and I personally don't see the point of these user names still existing. When they do come on though, all they do is spam and vandal.
Do you know of any good mods I could pass this on to? Unlike Shadow Sonic Silver whatever who is usually alright outside of here and seems to be reformed from vandalism anyhow, these two are actually complete jackasses in real life.
Silver Fang 10:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Archive
I just read your message. Is there a policy/guideline regarding how big a talk page has to be to become archived? I'm sure I have seen something else about this before. It wasn't on WP:ARCHIVE, was it? ~I'm anonymous
- There really is no rule about when it can be archived, its up to the individual user. All being said it is good to have medium sized archives. DBZROCKS 22:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Nice job with the warning templates
Hey Great job on warning than Vandal User:BdzDiapers.Just wanna stop by and tell you.Have a nice day Arnie 23:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliment I just like stoping vandals from destroying the hard work of all our wikipedians. DBZROCKS 23:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
RE: Thanks
No problem. Glad to help.-- bulletproof 3:16 00:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Coola
You may want to check this to make sure I didn't change too much. I used AWB (a bot-like program) to do it. --Deskana (AFK 47) 01:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yep I checked, everything looks fine. DBZROCKS 01:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Where to Find Coola's Romanization
Form what I've seen you seem to now a lot about DBZ. I was wondering if you could tlel me where I could find the official romanization of Coola's name, because I always thought it was "Cooler"—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tempest115 (talk • contribs)
- Its Coola, Funimation decided to change his name to cooler for an unexplained reason. DBZROCKS 12:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Recoome's retirement
This is sad; exactly what made Recoome and Power Level (the user) retire? Power Level returned but from what I can understand, they've had a bit of qualms against each other in the past. Someone recently created an account named Prince Zarbon on the Dragon Ball wikia and I fear this may have something to do with Recoome's upsetting. It's a shame, they both appear to be useful users despite this mere problem. I wish I could work it out with them, yet I fear I may get involved with the wrong ppl. ~I'm anonymous
- Hey, check out the new Goku pic. Pretty cool, isn't it? ~I'm anonymous
- I wish I knew earlier that you were making a Power Level article (as seen on your userpage). Here's the one we have on the Dragon Ball wiki [1]. Yes, I was the one who added references there some time ago. HINT HINT: I go by the name Burdock on that wikia. Cheers! ~I'm anonymous
- That new image looks kinda, well I think i would do better in the android saga section. DBZROCKS 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, why should the image be in the Android Saga section? ~I'm anonymous
- Because thats when Goku and King Kai die. DBZROCKS 20:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, why should the image be in the Android Saga section? ~I'm anonymous
- That new image looks kinda, well I think i would do better in the android saga section. DBZROCKS 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I wish I knew earlier that you were making a Power Level article (as seen on your userpage). Here's the one we have on the Dragon Ball wiki [1]. Yes, I was the one who added references there some time ago. HINT HINT: I go by the name Burdock on that wikia. Cheers! ~I'm anonymous
- Like Majinvegeta said, any picture is better than that other top one. Therefore, the Goku & King Kai should be the top one for now. Oh, and 250px makes Goku look a bit small; 300px seems just right. There doesn't have to be consistency with the sizes of the other DB images. ~I'm anonymous
- Earlier, you had mentioned in the talk page of WP:DBZ about nominating Majin Buu for "good article status", right? I wouldn't say Buu's article is good enough, but you know who's is? Belzi's! I'm sure you might know him from another of Toriyama's manga called Sand Land. How 'bout nominating his article for "good article status"? Waddya say? ~I'm anonymous
- Thanks for responding. I was hoping you could put it up for nomination though; as I'm a bit busy at the moment. Okay? ~I'm anonymous
- Are you available? You said you would help nominate Belzi for good article status, did you not? I'll do it, if you can teach me. ~I'm anonymous
- Sorry about the late response was at school. The process of nomanating articles is long so heres a link. Good luck. Also your page is getting kinda cluttered (no offense) want me to archive it for you? DBZROCKS 20:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Are you available? You said you would help nominate Belzi for good article status, did you not? I'll do it, if you can teach me. ~I'm anonymous
- Thanks for responding. I was hoping you could put it up for nomination though; as I'm a bit busy at the moment. Okay? ~I'm anonymous
- Earlier, you had mentioned in the talk page of WP:DBZ about nominating Majin Buu for "good article status", right? I wouldn't say Buu's article is good enough, but you know who's is? Belzi's! I'm sure you might know him from another of Toriyama's manga called Sand Land. How 'bout nominating his article for "good article status"? Waddya say? ~I'm anonymous
No prob. I guess I'll have to put it up for good article thingy. Don't worry, I can archive my own talk page. I'll do it as soon as it reaches the standard 32 kb., ok? Thanks. ~I'm anonymous
- Ok, let's hope Beelzebub makes the good article status. Oh, and I just found the link regarding when one should archive a talk page right here. As I've said, 32 kbs., just a fun fact! ^_^ ~I'm anonymous
- Whether it is too huge or not, it is guideline criteria; the recommendation is 32 KB. It is just as recommended as archiving a talk page, further there is no obligation to follow such guidelines. It depends on the user, I guess. ~I'm anonymous
- So did you nominate Belzi yet? DBZROCKS 21:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yes, it has been established. ~I'm anonymous
- So did you nominate Belzi yet? DBZROCKS 21:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Whether it is too huge or not, it is guideline criteria; the recommendation is 32 KB. It is just as recommended as archiving a talk page, further there is no obligation to follow such guidelines. It depends on the user, I guess. ~I'm anonymous
Android help
Hi, I added several androids to the DBZ character list, but I dont know most of the voice actors who played them. Maybe you can help out? Stormin' Foreman 22:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:SpealTCGCard.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SpealTCGCard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)