User talk:DASonnenfeld/Archive 17
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:DASonnenfeld. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
COI editor seek assistance on Environment America page
Hello DA Sonnenfeld. My name is Dan Cook. I work with Elizabeth Ridlinngton who you know as User:CleanWater17. She has asked me to take over editing duties for the Public Interest Research Group-related articles on Wikipedia. I have been a Wikipedia editing trainer, advisor, and, more recently, a direct editor on behalf of paying clients for more than a decade. I love and respect Wikipedia and only seek to make it a better resource for readers.
We would appreciate your help with a revision of the opening paragraph of the Environment America article. An anonymous editor, User:Blorpfiend, recently vandalized the paragraph. Since this is the only edit in Blorpfiend’s history, and Blorpfiend does not have a user description page, I suspect they have a grievance with PIRG. They added two “facts” in the intro: one is false, the other accurate but probably does not belong in the intro.
Would you be willing to review my revision request? I can put it in the COI edit request template format on the talk page of the article if that works for you, or I can just place the request here on your talk page. My preference would be to revert the edit in its entirety, given the anonymity of the editor and the likelihood this is a ‘payback’ edit of some type. I would be willing to leave the Charity Navigator reference as is, since what it states is true. But it does seem out of place in the intro. Please advise me. Thanking you in advance, DanDavidCook (talk) 22:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Dan Cook, Thank you for your note. I looked at the article that you referenced and was unable to find a reliable source for the one statement, and removed it, at least for now. I refined the reference to the Charity Navigator rating and moved it to its own section. It is fairly common for articles such as this to include a 'Criticisms' section. If the editor involved is able to come up with a reliable source for the referenced claim, it may end up in such a section at some point. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! Elizabeth speaks highly of you and I appreciate your response to the request. She and I were thinking of asking for a Criticisms or Controversies section for legal and related matters. We thought perhaps Controversies would cover a wider range of actions, since PIRG and EA initiate a fair amount of litigation as plaintiffs in environmental cases. But maybe both sections would also work. We would love to get your feedback on that. DanDavidCook (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, my suggestion there would be to outline what you have in mind on the talk page for that article. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Will do! Thanks! DanDavidCook (talk) 22:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, my suggestion there would be to outline what you have in mind on the talk page for that article. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! Elizabeth speaks highly of you and I appreciate your response to the request. She and I were thinking of asking for a Criticisms or Controversies section for legal and related matters. We thought perhaps Controversies would cover a wider range of actions, since PIRG and EA initiate a fair amount of litigation as plaintiffs in environmental cases. But maybe both sections would also work. We would love to get your feedback on that. DanDavidCook (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
COI editor seeking to improve PIRG main article
Hello User:DASonnenfeld. This is Dan Cook, who is being paid to improve the Public Interest Research Group article and related ones such as Environment America. I do not want to impose unduly on your time. But since you helped improve the EA article, I thought it appropriate to ask for you help on the PIRG article before I reach out to other editors.
My first request is, I think, a simple fix. Here it is in the COI edit request format. And please feel free to decline if it interferes with other priorities. I will have several other requests over the coming weeks.
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello there my name is Dan Cook. I am a paid editor hired to improve the main Public Interest Research Group article and others related to it. I would like to request a quick fix to the first paragraph of the History section. The reason for the request is that the two citations at the end of the graph--5 & 6--have been left out, leaving only the numbers. My suggestion is to NOT include 5, because it does not support any information in the graph, but to add in 6, which does. So my COI edit request is as follows:
| Current text | Replace with |
|---|---|
| Ross helped students across the country set up the first PIRG chapters, then became the director of the New York Public Interest Research Group in 1973.[5][6] | Ross helped students across the country set up the first PIRG chapters, then became the director of the New York Public Interest Research Group in 1973.[1] |
Thanks in advance for your assistance. DanDavidCook (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Nader, Ralph; Ross, Donald; English, Brett; Highland, Joseph (1971). Action for a Change. A Student's Manual for Public Interest Organizing. New York: Grossman Publishers. ISBN 978-0-670-10319-5.
- Hi DanDavidCook, Please place this request for assistance on the talk page of the referenced article, not on my personal talk page. Thank you. I'm unable to assist further with such requests at this time. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- (Have moved this request to the article's talk page. Just passing by here on your talk page, DASonnenfeld, to make this request no longer show up in Category:Requested edits) – Thjarkur (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Sharon L. Contreras for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon L. Contreras until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nominating on request of an IP. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:interpretation has been nominated for discussion
Category:interpretation has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 19:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:People with Lyme disease has been nominated for deletion
Category:People with Lyme disease has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Solid Waste Association of North America for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solid Waste Association of North America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of List of environmental degree-granting institutions in the United States for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of environmental degree-granting institutions in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Reywas92Talk 22:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:French mission settlements in North America has been nominated for discussion
Category:French mission settlements in North America has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 16:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
COI editor needing help correcting error on Environment America page
Hi @DASonnenfeld- I recently noticed that some information on the Environment America page refers to Environment America Research & Policy Center, a related but separate organization. I have a conflict of interest with this page and don't want to edit the text myself. (I've corrected the text box, which I believe is ok to do, but please let me know if I'm wrong about that.)
I've very much appreciated your help editing this page in the past and am wondering if you could take a look at the proposed revisions I've posted on the Environment America talk page.
Thank you very much for any help or feedback you can provide. CleanWater17 (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Unmanned blimps of China
A tag has been placed on Category:Unmanned blimps of China indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Geographers on Film for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geographers on Film, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geographers on Film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Category:Historical buildings in Syracuse, New York has been nominated for deletion
Category:Historical buildings in Syracuse, New York has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 01:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)