User talk:DAS SOHAM

Welcome!

Hello, DAS SOHAM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Paleo Neonate - 00:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm KAP03. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Homer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 23:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding huge swathes of unrelated, uncited content to articles

Hello! I have noticed that you have repeatedly edited several articles including Anactoria, Sappho, Homer, Criticism of the Bible, and Ode to Aphrodite. There are numerous problems with your edits. The first problem is that the content you added is not relevant to the content of the article. For instance, at Homer, you added an entire new section about Homer's infrequent use of the word "meanwhile." This is an extremely trivial matter that does not belong in an encyclopedia article about Homer. The second problem is that the content you added was completely uncited and appeared to consist entirely of original research. Here at Wikipedia, all statements must be cited to reliable sources. Please, slow down, only add material that is relevant to the subject of the article, and make sure to provide sources for all the material you add. --Katolophyromai (talk) 00:11, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. I think that your questions in the Criticism of the Bible article were related and valid, but Wikipedia must indeed represent what reliable sources say on the subject; the material must be supported by references. Moreover, there are common theological and philosophical terms which can be used to describe a number of those. Examples are theodicy, eschatology, trinitarianism, etc, and various scholars have discussed those topics so we can summarize those, instead of inserting our own unsourced original research. I have left a welcome message at the top of your page with more information on how Wikipedia works. Thank you, and happy editing, —Paleo Neonate - 00:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sappho to Anactoria (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Criticism of the Bible. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Criticism of the Bible was changed by DAS SOHAM (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947134 on 2017-07-31T12:27:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Biblical criticism, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Biblical criticism was changed by DAS SOHAM (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881114 on 2017-07-31T12:31:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soham Das

Hello DAS SOHAM,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Soham Das for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 16:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soham Das moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Soham Das, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Soham Das concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Soham Das, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Soham Das

Hello, DAS SOHAM. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Soham Das".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]