User talk:DAP384

Surrey Center

The article Surrey Center has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Merope 14:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Rd.

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Washington Rd., by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Washington Rd. fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Non-notable street/business listing.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Washington Rd., please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Washington Rd. itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Augusta Exchange

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Augusta Exchange, by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Augusta Exchange seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Augusta Exchange, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Augusta Exchange itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Mullins Crossing

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mullins Crossing, by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mullins Crossing seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mullins Crossing, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Mullins Crossing itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Surrey Centre

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Surrey Centre, by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Surrey Centre seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Surrey Centre, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Surrey Centre itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bistro 491

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bistro 491, by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bistro 491 seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bistro 491, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Bistro 491 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Calvert's

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Calvert's, by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Calvert's seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Calvert's, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Calvert's itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sweetbier Fair

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sweetbier Fair, by Astrovega (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sweetbier Fair seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sweetbier Fair, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sweetbier Fair itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Surrey Centre

I've nominated Surrey Centre, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Surrey Centre satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrey Centre and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Surrey Centre during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Astrovega 04:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

You seem to be adding a good many articles on shopping centers around Atlanta--some of them are probably notable, others not. And I see another editor has been trying to delete all of them, which I think inappropriate. The "power centers" will have to go, --and have gone-- these are simply not appropriate in the absence of something really special to say. But Surrey is probably notable, and Atlanta certainly--and these have also been nominated for deletion. Both need discussion of the likely problems in relationship with the community--roads, development rights, etc. There's usually some interesting politics. Both articles are in need of references from regional papers or other sources, and I would advise you to add them as soon as possible--this is very important. Surrey also needs some basic information such as size and date of construction, and the like.

If you want to help your (probable) clients, I remind you that WP does not favor apparent Conflict of interest--see WP:COI and any articles from such a source will be looked at very critically. If you do add such an article, make certain that it's for something unquestionably important and has good references. If you add weak articles, it casts suspicion about even the strong ones.

There is one other thing you can do to help, for these and in general. If you can provide one good photograph per article, with released copyright under the GFDL license, this is appropriate. But you must follow exactly the licensing requirements at WP:Copyright. All WP content is available for any use, even commercial, and so all rights must be transferred, and in the formal way described there.

Please be careful, otherwise your work will just get deleted. There's no point in adding articles that are sure to be removed. DGG 17:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

America's Next Top Model

Remember to Provide An Edit Summary
Hello and thank you for your contributions. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to America's Next Top Model. This helps everyone to understand what is changed. It may be a good idea to set your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thank you.

--LeyteWolfer 17:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC) ^{(talk|contribs)}[reply]

AfD nomination of Midtowne Little Rock

Midtowne Little Rock, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Midtowne Little Rock satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midtowne Little Rock and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Midtowne Little Rock during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Augusta Exchange

An article that you have been involved in editing, Augusta Exchange, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusta Exchange. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Adrianwn (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]