User talk:D12Blame
==
[edit]June 2013
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 19:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)D12Blame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to be unblocked so i can continue to add factual information. A page I was working on has since been sabotaged http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Rensselaer_%28surname%29 D12Blame (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Request does not address reason for block -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The article Martha Van Rensselaer Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of significance.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TKK bark ! 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)