User talk:D.Belford

Welcome!

Hi, D.Belford. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Mr Ernie (talk) 12:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

D.Belford (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I am requesting that Drmies or another admin copy and paste this request to the Enjois SPI investigation page since i am unable to edit apparently for 24 hours due to autoblock (for the record i just joined wikipedia and I am not a sockpuppet or a sock of enjois). I am requesting to be unblocked because the user who blocked me (Drmies) apparently is an activist ideologue masquerading as a neutral wikipedia admin/editor based on his remarks. He accused me of being "white and right-wing" without any evidence at all (i am actually biracial and consider myself a liberal centrist) and all of my edits were done by the book and NPOV. He also accused me of editing from a POV when all of my edits were reliably sourced (as you will see if you check) and were all done in a NPOV manner obeying the rules of wikipedia. D.Belford (talk) 04:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Belford, I wasn't talking about you--I was talking about your edits. That you cannot understand that NPOV and V are entirely different things is probably the reason your edits, under all those accounts, get reverted so often. POV content can easily be reliably sourced--that's not the point. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop smearing me (you already accused me of being a white right-winger, which I am neither) and now you are insinuating I have other accounts. Please stop attacking other users just because you are an admin who likes abusing their power. D.Belford (talk) 05:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your use of singular they. Drmies (talk) 05:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to clarify something I forgot to mention yesterday. I do share a home with 7 other people so it is possible that one of these people also edits wikipedia and I am being confused with them. I just began editing this website a few days ago and am surprised that I have already ran into such controversy. All of the edits I made were in accordance with wikipedia rules and policy as any fair admin who checks will see. An aggressive admin named Drmies apparently is a supporter or possibly friend of Justin Fairfax, or an ideologue activist masquerading as a neutral admin (has to be one of those three things or doesn't make any sense why he came after me so aggressively). If a checkuser admin finds that other people associated with this IP address wrongly edited wikipedia please ban them but please do not prevent me from contributing to wikipedia in the future. Thank you. D.Belford (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

D.Belford (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to clarify something I forgot to mention yesterday. I do share a home with 7 other people so it is possible that one of these people also edits wikipedia and I am being confused with them. I just began editing this website a few days ago and am surprised that I have already ran into such controversy. All of the edits I made were in accordance with wikipedia rules and policy as any fair admin who checks will see. An aggressive admin named Drmies apparently is a supporter or possibly friend of Justin Fairfax, or an ideologue activist masquerading as a neutral admin (has to be one of those three things or doesn't make any sense why he came after me so aggressively). If a checkuser admin finds that other people associated with this IP address wrongly edited wikipedia please ban them but please do not prevent me from contributing to wikipedia in the future. Thank you. D.Belford (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have essentially just admitted to WP:MEAT. Therefore, we have to leave this block in place. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

activist idealogue

And yet you use alt-right catch phrases. (On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog). BTW, you are not autoblocked for 24 hours. You are blocked directly per WP:checkuser evidence. (not to mention the behavioral evidence.) And certainly more check users will examine all of this thoroughly. Please read up on check users and please read the pertinent part of the GAB. Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, please point to where i used an "alt-right catch phrase". I never did such a thing because i am not a member of the alt-right or other white racist groups. Why are you just making things up? Are you like Drmies where you just lie and try to block other users because you disagree with their good-faith NPOV edits? D.Belford (talk) 05:06, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No excuse me. PS While you are reading, Please read WP:BLP The content you insisted upon (stop me if you've read this before) was a violation of that policy. Once again, when an admin (or any other user) invokes BLP, you need to pay attention. In fact even if (my some miracle) you are totally cleared of sock puppetry, I would oppose unblocking you until you evidenced understanding of and intent to adhere to BLP. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed how you didn't point to any alt-right catch phrase i used...wonder why? Please stop attacking me by making things up.

User:Dlohcierekim, I'm looking through the socks' edits. Funny--I think there are porn-only accounts there (User:Veios, for instance), like somehow the right-wing propaganda shouldn't get mixed up with the porning. Drmies (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]