User talk:Cyde/Admin criteria

Oo oo oo, I've got another one! How about: "Must speak at least three languages." Or something like that. Grandmasterka 02:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

So.. I was reading this, and as I went down, was grumbling "is he serious...?" and then got past about 10 and realized.. ok.. this was a joke, wasn't it.. (I hope) -Goldom (t) (Review) 08:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Is there anyone who satisfies your criteria? -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Does anyone who claims he/she satisfies #19 need to provide reliable sources? -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

If you'll notice, #16 is the requirement for being a U.S. President. I'm not sure if anyone has dreams in Wikisource or has "root on Wikipedia's servers" (whatever that means.) And anyone know how long U.S. copyright law is? That'd take a long time to memorize... Grandmasterka 18:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I find #11 #12 to be almost as harsh as the U.S. copyright memorization, myself. Grandmasterka 18:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I doubt Cyde has completed #19. ILovePlankton 00:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

I want to know how to pull off #21. KillerChihuahua^?!? 09:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Me too. ILovePlankton 17:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

How exactly does one fulfill #27? Do you have to let everyone edit you? --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 02:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

everything below #4 looks like a joke to me.--Ac1983fan 19:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

How will he know if you fulfill #12? He doesn't go to my school. He doesn't know the names of every single editor on RfA.--CJ King 04:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Ideas

1. Must have a vocabulary of at least 100,000 words
2. Must be able to recite every line Jack Bauer has ever uttered
3. Must have blonde hair, blue eyes
4. Must have a bra size of at least 36 C or a penis size of at least 7 inches (or both, unless the candidate is a male over 400 pounds)
5. Must not have a "quick strike".

— Deckiller 19:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Ha ha!

I'm right with you ;) delldot | talk 23:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Criterion 6

I would have thought something along the lines of "Fix a speedy candidate to FA standard" would be a bit more appropriate. I think your standards are slipping, if you don't update them regularly you will be letting any old riff-raff to become great. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 02:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely lovely!

And I suggest we employ similar criteria for registering an account in the first place :) >Radiant< 10:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmm

1. check
2. check
3. check
4. ~check
5. check
6. Sort of.
7. Almost.
8. <whips out calculator> you didn't say how positive, did you? <dives through loophole> check.
9. check
10. Will have by next week, if you like...
11. check (Got VF open sourced)
12. Irrelevant (make that check or uncheck as you see fit)
13. Depends on what you call substantial part.
14. My uncle is, does that count?
15. Something like that.
16. I have do have nethack on my computer, don't get greedy
17. check
18. Does exomemory count? if so, check.
19. ~check
20. Ok, no problem (~check)
21. Maybe I do, maybe I don't. (~check)
22. No idea, never tried.
23. fortunately, no.
24. does exomemory count? If so, check.
25. check
26. I haven't requested that yet, I see no need. (Could make it ~check if required perhaps)
27. You didn't specify the server size or scope of backup. Check.
28. But of course, Check

Wow, I meet so many of those... scary. --Kim Bruning 16:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Policy

This should be made policy. :P Yonatan ^talk 02:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)