User talk:Cyclips

Tallest buildings in the UK

Please add comments to the talk page, not on the article. Note also that this particular article is about buildings (inhabitable) not communications towers. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 04:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on List of digital terrestrial television channels (UK). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 23:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of digital terrestrial television channels (UK). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 16:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of digital terrestrial television channels (UK), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 16:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of DTT channels IN the UK

Hi. The problem is the edit you added to the tables of channel removed are not supposed to be there because this table is only is for only channels removed from the DTT platform, this does not include channels that have ceased broadcasting or channels that have changed there name. (Ruth-2013 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)) If you look this is what it says at the top of the tables: These are channels that have been removed from digital terrestrial television. This does not include rebranded channels or channels that have ceased broadcasting.(Ruth-2013 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)) The other thing is most of the channels are listed by there actual channel name and not the service name used on the DTT platform as there known by different names on other platforms. (Ruth-2013 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)) I have requested and been granted 3 days full protection on the list of DTT channels article till this is resolved.(Ruth-2013 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruth-2013 (talk • contribs)

Postnominals (Margaret Tyzack)

Hi Cyclips

I need to wise you up re postnominals. A higher level within the same order of chivalry is said to subsume any lower levels. That is, an Officer subsumes a Member, a Companion or Commander subsumes a Member or an Officer, and a Knight or Dame subsumes any of the other three. If Margaret Tyzack had been appointed a Member of the Order of the British Empire, then later appointed a Commander of the Royal Victorian Order – different orders – then she’d be Margaret Tyzack CVO MBE. But both her honours were from the same order – the Order of the British Empire - so only the higher or highest one is shown. I tried to explain this in my edit summary, using the analogy that a soldier who’s progressively promoted from Lieutenant to Major to Colonel to General is only ever shown as the rank he’s at at any given time, not all the earlier ones he had. But you seem to have just ignored this and ploughed on without explanation or discussion. Please don’t do this; it really pisses people off. Thanks -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 02:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]