User talk:Cybersecurity101

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cybersecurity101! Thank you for your contributions. I am Aoidh and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Aoidh (talk) 22:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WeSam Musa

Hello, Cybersecurity101. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, WeSam Musa, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ColonelHenry (talk) 01:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Advanced persistent threat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Cyberwarfare. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Cyberwarfare. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Your addition to Leadership ‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kuru (talk) 13:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can see by looking at your edit history that you seem to be adding material from one specific author. If that is you, we have no way of knowing it, and the material is clearly identified as under copyright by the site you uploaded it to. I would encourage you to maybe take a step back and read our policies on sourcing and on conflict of interest before making any other edits. Kuru (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Hello, Cybersecurity101. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

This appears to be a single purpose account. In addition to attempting to add a new biography to Wikipedia, the editor has repeatedly attempted to add links and text about that person to many articles [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], and remove other researchers from articles [8] [9]. O3000 (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]