User talk:Cybermann

Welcome

Hello, Cybermann, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Totino-Grace High School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Minnesota School Fires Two Openly Gay Employees In A Single Year - Salon.com - Sept.9.2013]</ref>
FaceBook Page - LGBTA Alumni of Totino-Grace]</ref]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References and External Links

Please thoroughly read WP:RS and WP:EL before inserting links into articles. The links you have been adding to FetLife have either been blogs or do not constitute encyclopedic discussions of FetLife. – RobinHood70 ^talk 16:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Indiana SB 101 with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Avvo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FetLife External Links

Just to explain my re-reversion of the external links you re-inserted on the FetLife article, the Salon reference is already in the article, therefore it should not be added as an external link. The maybemaimed site is in no way considered to be encyclopedic content, and is, in fact, a site belonging to one of the editors of the article. That violates several points of both the ELNO and PROMO guidelines. – Robin Hood ^(talk) 20:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William H. Macy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Con. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cybermann. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Megyn Kelly while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Murph9000 (talk) 12:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. Your recent edit to Atherton High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Being the first from group X to do Y is not in any way indicative of notability as it will always fail WP:BLP1E. However, the person you added may meet the SNG for academics, WP:NPROF, but you have not shown that and will not be able to in the context of a "Notable" list. I'd suggest you look at the guideline and the available sources and see if you can write a bio on him per WP:WTAF John from Idegon (talk) 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cybermann. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Atherton High School. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 23:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John -

It is you who is engaging in an editing war. I posted about Edwin "Rip" Smith and you, without contacting me or anyone else at Atherton High School, (I do not believe you attended there) deleted my first post, falsely writing that Edwin "Rip" Smith was not notable, simply because he did not have a Wikipedia article. I then sent you Mr. Smith's obituary and you got all snarky and are now threatening to ban me, even thou I have been editing in Wikipedia for over a decade.

I wish to take your actions to a neutral party in Wikipedia to rule on what has occurred. Your threats are inappropriate and unnecessary. How do we find a mediator or arbitrator?

Dann DobsonCybermann (talk) 03:11, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition to the article, you replaced it without WP:CONSENSUS, in violation of the very useful essay WP:BRD. You came to my talk page and posted a message which was also quite snarky and contained an UNAMBIGUOUS copyright violation. I'll have the administrator who will need to oversight it explain that to you, Mr. Lawyer. I told you I'd reply later. Yet you still reinserted the disputed content back in the article still without the required consensus. My job which pays me and my family who loves me comes before the needs of some arrogant lawyer who thinks his time is more valuable than mine. Newsflash....no one cares here what you do for a living. If your not aware that copying something off a website that is clearly marked copyrighted and pasting it on to another website is a clear violation of copyright laws, you're a pretty piss poor lawyer. Hint: my talk page, and yours, and every other page on Wikipedia are headed with a URL. In case you weren't aware, that stands for Universal Resource Locater. Anyone, anywhere, can see it. There are no private communications on Wikipedia. Mr. Lawyer, consensus requires agreement. Being a pompous dick is not a good way to achieve an agreement. I learnt that without even going to law school.

Go to the article talk page, make reasoned arguments based in sources and informed by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Do not make appeals to emotion or make a feeble attempt at argument from authority like you did on my talk. Keep in mind that the subject of the article you are attempting to insert a large amount of copy about a single individual is a school, not a person. Keep in mind that there is a policy dictating who can be in a notable list (WP:NLIST) and that requirement is that the person must either have, or unambiguously qualify for, a Wikipedia biography.

Far and away your best choice would be to simply write his bio. The Times obit is a very good source. You've got almost all the info to complete a bio right there. However, the requirements for an article (see WP:GNG) is multiple reliable sources, totally independent of the subject, that discuss the subject in detail. The only other source you've provided is his employer, not independent. If you write his bio, and I'm reasonably sure you can, I have absolutely no opposition to including the following:

Edwin "Rip" Smith - first tenured black professor at a major law school, Wikilink to the school

referenced to the Times obit, in the article on Atherton.

BTW, your rambling above on where I went to school and contacting the school are totally ludicrous and exhibit absolutely no understanding of what Wikipedia is. Make it easy. Just write the damn bio. But I promise you this, if you reinsert content back in the school article without gaining consensus (which I've already told you you will have if you just write the bio), I will drag you to a noticeboard. That's not a threat. It is what will happen. You're the super important lawyer; you figure out how to obtain dispute resolution or make a complaint about my behavior. Not my problem. John from Idegon (talk) 04:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John -

You write that the way to reach consensus re: Edwin "Rip" Smith is to "simply write his bio". First, like you, I have a busy life and writing a full bio is not on my agenda right now. I just wanted to add Rip Smith to a simple list of our high school. Secondly, you say that I should use the L.A. Times obituary. But isn't that a violation of the Copyright guidelines you just jumped all over me about? Please explain how I can use the LA Times obit, as you say I should do and not violate Copyright Guidelines.

Dann

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cybermann. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cybermann. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following should be placed on your talk page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cybermann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to appeal my Editting Block, but I am unable to locate the violations I am accused of. How do I locate the violations I am accussed of? Cybermann

Decline reason:

Procedural decline per below, no block to reverse. Glad this is resolved. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't see a block on this account directly. What is the message you receive when you attempt to make an edit? 331dot (talk) 15:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt response. This is very strange. When I have tried to edit articles the last few times I was prohibited or blocked from doing so. The only dispute I have ever had on Wikipedia was when I attempted to add Edwin "Rip" Smith, as a notable graduate to Atherton High School, in Louisville where we both graduated from. I got in a brief editting war with John from Idegon (talk) 23:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC), and he threathened to block me, but that has been it.

I attempted to edit another article this morning, (sorry but I am having a senior moment and do not recall what that was) and the block appeared, and I posted this. Sorry, but I was unable to find the block, you desire to see. As I test I just went back to the Atherton HS page, and lo and behold, I was not blocked when I clicked on editting Notable Graduates.

It appears whatever the problem was has been resolved. Thank you for your efforts.

Cybermann Cybermann (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

Hi -

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I need some help from an administrator. I just attempted to create a new Wikipedia article, "Lawyers who have worked for Donald Trump", but when I attempted to create this new artcile I received the message "This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia."

Several months ago, when I first received this message, I attempted to find what blocks were placed on my account, by whom and for what violations of Wikipedia rules I committed or allegedly committed. The administrator I worked with at that time, sorry I do not know who that was, said they could not find a reason for the block(s) and said I was free to continue editing. Over the last few months I have continued to edit in Wikipedia, without problems, most recently about lawyer, L. Lynn Woods surrender of his law license, with no blocks or problems.

So I need assistance finding out why I am now again blocked, and unable to create this new article. As I explained months ago,to the previous administrator I worked with, I have only been in one Wikipedia dispute and that was when an old high school classmate, law professor Edwin "Rip" Smith,the first black law professor at USC, died and I attempted to add him as a Notable Person in our high school, Atherton High School https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherton_High_School,_Louisville, (as the first black professor at his law school), and another editor objected that Edwin "Rip" Smith was not notable, because there was no Wikipedia article about him, even thou I provided links to his obituary in the Los Angles Times. https://news.usc.edu/105013/in-memoriam-edwin-rip-smith-66/ https://news.usc.edu/105013/in-memoriam-edwin-rip-smith-66/

I would like to know the source of the block, my alleged (mis)behavior that led to the block, and removal of the block, so I may start this new important Wikipedia article. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance in this matter.

Cybermann

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong. There are currently multiple blocks against your username, your IP address, or both. The block details below give information about the longest block.

The IP address or range ‪2607:FB90:FA96:9738:60CA:4216:C894:DCCC‬ has been blocked (disabled) for the following reason(s):

There are multiple blocks against your account and/or IP address

Hy, Cybermann. I've copied this over from your userpage; help requests should go on a user talk page. (User pages are more for "about me"-type stuff, articles you want to work on, etc.) Looking at the block on that IP, it appears to only affect editors who are not logged in. It sounds like you may have just gotten logged out by accident? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 16:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]