User talk:Cyberchamp
April 2023
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Cameron Colvin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is a court judgement a poor source? I understand you probably don't have a formal education but a court judgement is a finding of fact. Cyberchamp (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Likewise, you accused me of defamatory content publicly. All of the content posted was true, which makes your statement defamatory. Im afraid I will have to go through wikipedias dispute resolution process and file suit. Cyberchamp (talk) 23:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "file suit"? Court judgments are unacceptable sources in articles about WP:BLPs, and you cited court dockets, not judgments, which is even worse.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Again, it was not court dockets. They are clearly judgements. The statement you publicly made about me defaming the person is vehmently false as all things were sourced with court judgements. I've referred me intent to file suit to wikipedia legal and a ticket has been established. Cyberchamp (talk) 23:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Had you paid attention on the 11th you'd've learned that docket vs. judgment is a distinction without a difference - both are unusable for these claims per WP:Biographies of living persons. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- At the end of the day, you could have said the sources weren't in line with policy. You stated my content was defamatory, which by definition means libelous or slanderous, wikipedia is going to have to handle this through the courts. Cyberchamp (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Again, it was not court dockets. They are clearly judgements. The statement you publicly made about me defaming the person is vehmently false as all things were sourced with court judgements. I've referred me intent to file suit to wikipedia legal and a ticket has been established. Cyberchamp (talk) 23:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "file suit"? Court judgments are unacceptable sources in articles about WP:BLPs, and you cited court dockets, not judgments, which is even worse.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC)- Now you have retaliated Cyberchamp (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- I should add that you engaged in WP:LOUTSOCK with Special:contributions/198.102.151.243 back on April 11 when you created this account.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- No I did not. This is another defamatory statement made by you. Again, you have made multiple statements about me that now are going to force me to engage in litigation against you in a personal capacity. Cyberchamp (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- No I did not. This is another defamatory statement made by you. Again, you have made multiple statements about me that now are going to force me to engage in litigation against you in a personal capacity. Cyberchamp (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)