User talk:Cwater1/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Lakefront Empire moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lakefront Empire. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

So far, one source has been added. I will add an infobox and get more details and sources. I'll try to do it later on today. Cwater1 (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakefront Empire has been accepted

Lakefront Empire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mississippi Highway 740

Hello, Cwater1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mississippi Highway 740, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm Smuckola. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. Hi! I guess I'll make perfectly crystal clear what you've been told over and over and over above. Please stop making unencyclopedic edits, including unencyclopedic draft articles, unsourced (WP:RS) material, or sourced but non-notable (WP:N WP:GNG) material. AfC made a mistake (as they often do in their deluge of workload) in allowing anything you pushed through with only two sources, and you simply must stop pushing it. I know you mean well, and you somehow think that something is better than nothing, but it absolutely is WP:NOT. You just published completely unsourced WP:FANCRUFT at [1] and [2]. Your attempt at articles should be in your own private sandbox until they clearly demonstrate WP:GNG with a large body and a robust amount of WP:SECONDARY WP:RSes. No stubs. I hope that is clear, and you can ask anything at WP:TEAHOUSE for support, but you gotta seriously read all the links given to you by me and everybody else. Thanks so much. — Smuckola(talk) 01:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

@Smuckola Sorry about that. I wasn't trying to be disruptive. I was trying to help build an encyclopedia. Cwater1 (talk) 01:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

I know! It's really hard and unfair, and there's no real training! :) I blame Wikipedia's insanely irresponsibly open policy in this case because I admire pretty much all your other edits I glanced at in your history. — Smuckola(talk) 01:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

It's all good. Wikipedia has a lot. Just got to make the edits will be constructive. Wish the best of luck Cwater1 (talk) 01:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

This is probably a reminder. I imagine this is referring to the Attempted assassination of Donald Trump article that I edited several times. I edited the Donald Trump article as well. I am being careful, I don't want to end up getting expelled from contributing. Cwater1 (talk) 16:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

To reiterate, the above message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. It's just a reminder that the area exists. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I did figure that out. I read through that link. Thank you, you are all doing great. Cwater1 (talk) 19:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)