User talk:Cutza

Copyright problem: Draft:Indie Classical

Hello Cutza! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Indie Classical, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://pdfcoffee.com/indie-classical-genre-pdf-free.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Indie Classical and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Indie Classical, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Indie Classical. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Indie Classical with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Indie Classical saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:15, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Indie Classical

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Indie Classical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pdfcoffee.com/indie-classical-genre-pdf-free.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cutza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, thank you so much for your feedback, this was my first submission to Wikipedia and I neglected to check the copyright guidelines. I am the author of the article in question that was posted to this website https://pdfcoffee.com/indie-classical-genre-pdf-free.html but now I have sent an email to donate my work through Wikimedia Commons. I can corroborate that this article is mine because it is hosted on my personal website at (I can't link to it because it's hosted on an xyz domain) and I don't know how it made it to the pdfcoffee site in question. It appears to be a repository of academic articles and it probably obtained my document from my Academia.edu profile seen here [[1]]. Please let me know how I can proceed. Cutza (talk) 8:30 am, 23 October 2022, last Sunday (2 days ago) (UTC−6)

Accept reason:

The username has been changed now, and the copyright issue seems like it will be resolved soon. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue is mostly resolved here. VRT agents can see ticket:2022102310007774 for permission, and vrtwiki:Undeletion requests#ticket:2022102310007774 for the only hold-up; Cutza, I'll be in touch about that if necessary, but it's just a procedural issue. As to the block, @Nihonjoe: I'm not seeing the promo and username vio here... is there something I'm missing? His username is the same as his website, but per WP:PROMONAME that's allowed for personal sites that don't function in order to generate any kind of income or revenue for the owner. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Since we can't really know if any income is derived from it, that's a difficult thing to determine. Regardless, they've changed their username, so it's a moot point. I've unblocked them. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your understanding, I really appreciate your time. Cutza (talk) 16:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored Draft:Indie Classical, and have placed {{free-content attribution}} on it so that it complies with Wikipedia:Plagiarism (a guideline separate from our copyright policy). -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Indie Classical

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Indie Classical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pdfcoffee.com/indie-classical-genre-pdf-free.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 02:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought we already went through this, please see above regarding the copyright clearance, and let me know if there's anything else I need to do to avoid this being an issue in the future. Thank you for your support. Cutza (talk) 03:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I hadn't completely looked through the history and forgot to notify you that the nomination was erroneous. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 04:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indie Classical has been accepted

Indie Classical, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 12:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]