User talk:Cutie 4 life

It is suspected or confirmed that this user is the puppet master of one or more abusive or block / ban-evading sock puppets.
See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets.
The use of abusive sockpuppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sockpuppets
to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset.

Jkrstl

Just out of curiosity, on the Jkrstl talk page, did you actually think that nobody would notice that you asked yourself the question about location? If you go to history, it lists who made which entry for any wikipedia page. Just a FYI. Dipics 16:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i was just helping with the add so you now so people could see that someone else wrote somthing.and im a new user so i didnt know that.--Cutie 4 life 02:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

And, we all realize that it is an add which is why it is up for deletion. Plus, it wasn't "someone else" that wrote the piece in the discussion. It was you. And the question it asked was addressed to you. So, you were asking yourself a question hoping that everyone else would think that the question was written by someone else. This is at least slightly on the dishonest side. Dipics 03:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Hannah Montana and MySpace

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. szyslak (t, c, e) 23:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if your blanking of Talk:Hannah Montana was a mistake. I left you the vandalism message because you had done the exact same thing to Talk:MySpace: you blanked everything except your own comment. That's a common thing for vandals to do here. I first saw your edits to Talk:MySpace, then looked up your contribution history to see if you had made similar edits. That's where I found the Hannah Montana blanking, not because I'm interested in that show. (In fact, I've never seen it and probably never will). As for your question of "why I care", I care because we don't blank pages around here. It erases people's hard work and ongoing discussions.

In any sense, I suggest you read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Talk pages are for discussing the article, not its subject. They are also not for general discussion, like "hi peeps let's chat", as you wrote on the Hannah Montana talk page. Wikipedia is not a chat room or a discussion forum. It is a project to build a free encyclopedia. Please remember that in the future. szyslak (t, c, e) 07:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Juan

Sorry but I'm not Bosnian. I am Mexican-American. --JuanMuslim ^1m 13:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your edits on Ricky Ullman

I've responded to your query on my talk page in order to keep the thread coherent. --Kbh3^rd talk 19:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during August 27 2006 (UTC) to Hilary Duff

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ryūlóng 03:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Info on Islamophobic group

Hello,

What follows are the sentiments, expressed in their own words, and in the 'protest signs', of the obscure, very small, but very vocal 'activist group' known as "Protest Warrior".

"What's becoming clear is how the religion of Islam is addicted to war and mayhem. Not a radical minority, not a rogue sect, but its very essence is about submission and sacrifice and proving your worth by worshipping death in this life to gain a paradise of orgies and drunkenness. Their entire history is of warfare, and any accomplishments of their so-called Golden Age has been proven to be merely parasitic off the cultures they've conquered and reduced to dhimmi servitude. That every country under sharia is corrupt, belligerent, desolate and barbaric obviously gives them no pause, except to constantly drive them into further psychotic rage as they refuse to ever accept any responsibility for their conditions. They are akin to the powers in Orwell's 1984; there must always be an enemy. It's no surprise that women are treated like property in these countries as that's the only way Muslim men can feed their egos, to dominate others rather than ever actually produce something."

Kfir Alfia and Alan Lipton, founders of "Protest Warrior"

Their 'protest signs'...

Signs

I thought you might be interested in this group's sentiments. They are currently very actively editing their own article on Wiki and there is a lot of 'group think'. Perhaps you might want to become involved in the editing and discussion process on that page. If you do, please don't vandalize, and try to remain civil. Should you not want to involve youself, please forgive my intrusion.

Protest Warrior

Protest Warrior Discussion

NBGPWS 08:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your page on WP

Hi, I think you wrote a page by mistake on wikipedia. I wanted to keep a copy to put it on your user page but the time I found the right tag to put on the page, the page was already gone. Please accept my apologies about that and remember to use your user page when you want to tell more about you (see WP:NOT). Regards, Lucasbfr 17:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :) Sorry I think I'm starting to speak jargon. WP is Wikipedia :) All the pages begining by "WP:" or "Wikipedia:" are official pages around here. I meant that I crossed a page of yours that seemed to be unsuitable for wikipedia (if I'm correct you started a page about you on the article space, and WP only keeps articles about notable people on the mainspace, articles about users need to be on the user space (the pages starting bu "User:")) and the time I started to think how I should mark it, an administrator had already deleted it :) If you have any questions don't hesitate :)-- lucasbfr ^talk 23:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a chat site

Please see WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a chat site. Talk pages are to be used for improving the associated article, not for edits like this. If you want a chat forum, please go to a message board. Thanks. --Yamla 15:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC) and were is the message board im a new user.--Cutie 4 life 01:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such message board on the Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a chat site. --Yamla 01:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah watever.--Cutie 4 life 21:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cute 1 4 u

Please state for the record whether you are the same user (or are closely related to) Cute 1 4 u. Many of your edits seem to be similar to that editor and that editor has been banned indefinitely from the Wikipedia. Please do not make any more edits until you have stated for the record whether you are the same user. --Yamla 15:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i am not cutie 1 4 u. i went to her user page and it seemed that we were a lot alike so i edited her discussion page and told her to reply but she never did.

Removing sockpuppet warning

Please stop removing the sockpuppet notice from the top of this page. The administrators are investigating to determine accurately whether or not you are a sockpuppet of Cute 1 4 u. If you are not, we will remove this warning ourselves. --Yamla 21:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message Board1

You have already been told that Wikipedia is not a message board. Your creation of Message Board1 was inappropriate. Please reread WP:NOT. --Yamla 21:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:MySpace, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 21:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from user

How do you people know evrything im doin????--Cutie 4 life 21:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? --Yamla 22:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like every time i do somthin u guys know wat I did.How do u know like wen i created message board 1.--Cutie 4 life 22:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We track edits of abusive editors and, from time to time, non-abusive editors. --Yamla 22:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours. You have already been asked to stop removing the sockpuppet warning from this page. --Yamla 22:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank this page again. If you do, we will be forced to protect even this page so you cannot edit it. We don't want to do that, though. As to your being Cute 1 4 u, you could very well be telling the truth. If so, we'll get it cleared up as soon as the checkuser request comes back. As previously noted, I'll then remove the warning from the top of this page and you will have our apologies. Until then, though, please do not remove it. Cute 1 4 u is a banned user and has caused us a substantial amount of difficulty. We need to make sure you aren't that user. That user's abusive edits have gotten bad enough that we are considering contacting her ISP and getting the Internet account terminated at that point so I'm sure you can understand how important it is to clear your name. We hope to be able to clear it within the next 24 hours or so. --Yamla 23:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know ive seen her discssion page there is a lot of bad language in it.But why do you think I am cutie 1 4 u?--Cutie 4 life 01:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

The Checkuser request came back and noted that you are (almost certainly) not User:Cute 1 4 u. Please accept my apologies. I have removed the notice about this account being a suspected sockpuppet and your name has been cleared. You are, of course, a sockpuppeteer of an abusive account, Cutie fo eva, but that's an entirely separate issue. --Yamla 22:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your applogie but i have to ask y did u think i was cutie 1 4 u?--Cutie 4 life 22:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were very similar and your name is virtually identical. You edit around the same time and you have mentioned Cute 1 4 u (if I remember correctly, and I may not) previously, unbidden. --Yamla 23:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for fraudulently altering the sockpuppet warning at the top of this page. --Yamla 00:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And this will earn you a longer block if you do it again. You're not a sockpuppet; just wait out the block. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 22:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your block timer has been reset. --Yamla 22:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to one week and this page has been protected to prevent your continued vandalism. You are welcome to resume editing once your block expires but please, no more vandalism. --Yamla 22:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As this account serves no useful purpose it has been blocked indefinitely, along with its sockpuppets. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 01:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]