User talk:CuteMice

Confirmed user

I have looked at your contributions, and you clearly know your way around, so I have given you confirmed user status. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

AFC Hold

Re. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Classifieds (and others)

Please do not change the status of AFCs from 'hold' to 'declined' until about a week has elapsed. I only placed that one on hold about an hour ago.

Please could you re-check the others you did. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  17:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The hold notice does say about 24 hrs so i was just following the guide. CuteMice·Talk 17:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

It had been on hold for one hour 13 minutes.

Also, you put another on-hold which contained personal information that required suppression. Please be more careful. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  17:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CuteMice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I thought the two days was up because I was able to create an account and two days had passed so you can't blame me. Please set an expiry.

Decline reason:

If your block had expired, you would be able to edit normally on the original account. Till you regain the ability to edit, you are still effectively blocked and thus not allowed to edit. You could have checked the block log to see the expiry time of the original block. Par WP:SOCK you are equally not permitted to create multiple account, especially not if the original account is blocked as this is seen as block evasion. This account will not be unblocked as it is a sockpuppet of your other account. Once the block on your other account expires you should resume editing on that account, instead of creating a new one. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 10:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You really need to start taking some responsibility for your own actions. You tried to lie your way into getting the rollback permission you covet so much, so don't pretend this was just a misunderstanding. Honesty is the best policy. Lying and block evasion will only make things worse, as should have been clear to you already. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked as a WP:SOCK.

I'm very disappointed in you that you were so impatient you couldn't just sit it out for two days. I'll be extending and re-setting the block on your original account as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh no :(

So, I will never be able to create an account again? What if someone else from this IP wants to? I didn't evade the block because I was blocked from creating an account and then it allowed me to make a new one so I did.

Creating an account and editing while blocked is block evasion. Why were you even trying it when you knew perfectly well you were supposed to be blocked? And what about your lying about being an experienced ip editor to get rollback? Your dishonest behavior is not welcome. Creating an account for dishonest purposes is never allowed, blocked or not. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

So, even though I am currently able to make accounts, I shouldn't? I am not clear. 90.194.208.26 (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC) (CuteMice/Ratinator)

Ratinator, yes, you shouldn't attempt to make any more accounts--nor should you edit articles anonymously, as that will probably just make the block even longer. Once the block expires on your Ratinator account, then you'll be free to edit as Ratinator--to see the exact time you were blocked (and, therefore, exactly when you'll be unblocked), go to the contributions page for your Ratinator account and look at the time that the block was applied by Beeblebrox. And, strictly speaking, it's probably best for you to post to the talk page on your Ratinator account, not here, since CuteMice has been blocked indefinitely. Hope that helps. Regards, • CinchBug • 18:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Exactly, as I've told you already, the block is on you, the person, under any identity and you should not be editing Wikipedia under any identity while the block on your account is in place. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I want my talk page and user page deleted and I want you to do everything you can do to make it look like I have deleted my accounts. Please do this to my page, Ratinators page and my IP addresses page. If you say no, why? CuteMice·Talk 18:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Because the right to vanish is not generally granted to users that are leaving "under a cloud" and is never granted to block evading sockpuppet accounts. You can add {{retired}} to the Ratinator page if you wish. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

can you do the retired thing for me? CuteMice·Talk 11:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Done here and here. If you've created any more sock puppets and you'd like them retired, let me know by posting here. TFOWR 14:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Not going to edit war over it, but this account is not "retired," it is indefinitely blocked. as a sockpuppet, not at all the same thing. This kid simply refuses to be held accountable for his actions and wants to play a little shell game to dodge responsibility and deny the truth. I wash my hands of this mess. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I have to agree with Beeblebrox. Accounts can't retire, only users can retire, and this is simply an illegitimate alternate account. (Though, given the zeal of this user, I doubt very much that they really intend to retire.) —DoRD (talk) 00:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)