User talk:Curmudgeonette

Welcome!

Hello, Curmudgeonette, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 29 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Lester Brickman page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lester Brickman with Monroe Price at Cardozo 1982.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lester Brickman with Monroe Price at Cardozo 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Acting Dean Lester Brickman at Cardozo accreditation reception 1982.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acting Dean Lester Brickman at Cardozo accreditation reception 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lester Brickman portrait 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lester Brickman portrait 2009.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you left a polite request on {Hullablloo Wolfowitz's talk page. I think you were asking where to put what we call the "fair use rationale".
While HB's answer was technically correct, I don't think it was a helpful answer to your question. Instead he or she informed you of how Brickman could write to the committee that handles confidential correspondence to establish an image was being used with appropriate permissions to alow it to be freely distributable. This is not an answer to your question about how to compliantly make use of non-free images.
The project has a standard form for uploading images. It helps the uploader fill out a standard template we use for images. The wikipedia has a narrow set of rules as to when we can make fair use of non-free images, described at WP:NFCC. A second set of templates, {{Non-free use rationale}} and {{Non-free fair use in}}, are used for those images that do comply with NFCC. When properly filled out those templates supply the explanation as to why that non-free image measures up to NFCC.
Why is the wikipedia so strict with its extra restrictions on fair use images? I can't answer that. I can tell you what those who zealously enforce these rules say... They say that the wikipedia can't use fair use images, because our end users could re-use those images in ways that violate the intellectual property rights of the original photographers. But we trust our end users to re-use images licenced under the creative commons or gfdl. If our end-users don't comply, we see that as their responsibility. None of the people who zealously enforce our extra restrictions on re-using images undr existing fair use laws has ever been able to explain why we can't trust our end users to re-use fair use images responsibly.
Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions on this or other matters.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you check the little photo I uploaded? Brickman, and three other experts, appeared on a panel with George W. Bush, in 2005. Unlike all other nations US law makes works of its Federal government, including the President's photographers, public domain. Did I select the correct panelist? Is that Brickman?
- I am sorry it is such a tiny picture, and doesn't show him face-on. But I think that, since a public domain picture of him exists, no fair use image will be agreed to...
- Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 02:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for your reply. Yes, leaving me a note on User talk:Geo Swan works. Most people would leave their reply here, following the original. An asterisk, colon, or octothorp, is a markup character, that causes the reply to be indented. You can put a {{ping|Joe Blow}} in any comment, and Joe Blow gets a heads-up the next time they log in.

So, that's him?

I am sorry that your attempts to use an image Dr Brickman specifically approved was made more complicated than necessary.

The instructions at Commons:OTRS explain how Dr Brickman would send a letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. An example letter is found at Commons:OTRS#E-mail template for release of rights to a file.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lester Brickman portrait 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lester Brickman portrait 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lester Brickman testifies at hearing Feb 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lester Brickman testifies at hearing Feb 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]