User talk:Curmi

AfD Nomination: Flinders Wharf

An editor has nominated the article Flinders Wharf for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flinders Wharf. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Flinders Wharf during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 21:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

references

I just added a reference section. You still need to clean up the references. TonyTheTiger 19:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Comparison of spreadsheet software has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 06:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of the external link to this article was unacceptable. It fails to qualify with the Wikipedia external links policy. And that's not even going into the obvious WP:COI issue. Trusilver 07:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]