User talk:Curiousbadger

Welcome to my talk page. Please leave a message at the bottom of the page and sign your name with four tildes (~). I will respond on your talk page, if applicable. Curiousbadger 13:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Narnia

Hello, and welcome to WikiProject Narnia. Feel free to help by being bold and checking out our to-do list. If you need anything go ahead and drop a note on my talk page. Bornagain4 16:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Seven Lords Re:

You should probably just drop a note on the WikiProject's discussion page. Bornagain4 13:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Curiousbadger! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- —Centrx→talk • 21:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Marble Brewery

I can fix the refs if nobody else does. It'll be tomorrow (Sat) though. Regards, Mr Stephen 15:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem. If you want to play (use a sandbox), have a look at the ref element, section 4 'how it works'. Then, if you like, move on to 'template:cite web' here, but that simply formats the reference in a certain manner. Regards, Mr Stephen 17:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

See how you like that. I've made one or two changes to avoid copyvio problems; feel free to improve the English. You had forgotten to add <references/>, so you didn't get the bibliography at the end. Regards, Mr Stephen 13:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Happy to help. Regards, Mr Stephen 11:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Helpful links

Why thank you lady, for the helpful links. This is hella addictive. Oops. See what you've done!

Drasticsturgeon 14:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Help

Regarding the page Trevor Lock, I have just removed an untrue and potentially damaging statement which was added by an unregistered user - is it possible to vandal proof the page, or does this have to be done by an admin? Is this an appropriate case for vandal blocking?

(I have attached a reference within the page to the only reported news article on the matter, and have been unable to find any other sources).

Edit-locking pages is something that we do rarely on Wikipedia, and I'm not sure this page would qualify. The best way to combat vandalism is to add the page to your watchlist to monitor the recent changes to it, and then revert any vandalism you see. You can use appropriate warning templates on the vandal's talk pages, and if particular users get out of line, you can request administrator intervention. I hope that's helpful! -- Merope 13:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

It is indeed! I've added the page to my watchlist to keep an eye out, and I'll bear the other points in mind. Thanks for the quick response :) Curiousbadger 14:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Whaling.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whaling.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, have now tagged the image as "book cover". Curiousbadger 22:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Fictional deities

Sorry for the delay, finally responded to your comments at Talk:List_of_fictional_deities Canonblack 11:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Brevity ... is wit.

A good edit at Alan Moore by you, I thought. A great writer but a rambling article. Fred.e 16:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Now I know about Stewart Lee. As indeed I should, if only because he writes about the Fall. His work sounds too good to ever be on Aus TV. Fred.e 11:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Narnia Newsletter March 2007

WikiProject Narnia Newsletter Issue 1 - 2nd March 2007 . Written by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs)
WikiProject Narnia News The WikiProject has been a little quiet lately. There are still quite a lot of Narnia stubs. It has been nearly three months since we last worked on Minor characters in The Chronicles of Narnia, which still looks very much like a draft page. That would be a nice article to get into the main namespace. Good and Featured Articles First Battle of Beruna has been listed as a GA. Our only FA at the moment is Narnian timeline. Other news WikiProject Narnia's first newsletter issue has been published. You're looking at it right now! Member News We are now proud of having PiratesArCool (talk · contribs), Mimepants (talk · contribs) and Johann1870 (talk · contribs) on our team. Good luck! To-do Add characters and bios to minor character draft page. Expand Narnia stubs. Link the first mention of a year in all Narnia-related articles to Narnian timeline. Rewrite character articles to use the Narnian character example article format. Adopt an article and improve it to the best of your ability. Wikify The Chronicles of Narnia article, especially the new lead and Narnian Universe sections	From the founder I am proud to present our first issue of the WikiProject Narnia Newsletter. I decided that we needed to alert everybody who had expressed interest in the project that there is much work to be done! Please check in every once in a while at the project talk page, and tell other project members what you've been up to in terms of Narnia articles. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || Article of the Month: Edmund Pevensie Edmund Pevensie is a major character in The Chronicles of Narnia. He appears as a principal character in three of the seven books. Edmund was the second to enter Narnia, although he tried to betray his siblings to the White Witch. However, Edmund managed to help save Narnia by neutralizing the White Witch's most powerful weapon, her wand. Collaboration of the Month: Shasta (Narnia) Shasta is currently quite short and not much of his background has been mentioned. The article also lacks images – but make sure if you upload one, you include a FU rationale. Contribute!

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whaling.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whaling.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scientists.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scientists.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:American virgin 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:American virgin 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Communists.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Communists.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Curiousbadger! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 42 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Nick Doody - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)