User talk:Curiousapien

Welcome!

Hello, Curiousapien, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Curiousapien/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 08:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Curiousapien/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Curiousapien/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Okey ! I planned to continue with this account... and as I told I am a writer for the known personalities, as I write about their biographies with the proper and official resources. So unless you unblock me, I am not able to proceed further and delete my recent edits. I hereby declare that if I will upload any article about a personality (in future), then a suitable link or resource will be provided; which I forgot to provide this time}}

. MER-C 11:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20546 was submitted on Feb 06, 2018 06:28:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okey ! I planned to continue with this account... and as I told I am a writer for the known personalities, as I write about their biographies with the proper and official resources. So unless you unblock me, I am not able to proceed further and delete my recent edits. I hereby declare that if I will upload any article about a personality (in future), then a suitable link or resource will be provided; which I forgot to provide this time"

Decline reason:

Accounts cannot be deleted. If you don't want your account anymore - simply stop editing. SQL ^{Query me!} 15:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I strongly advise that in order to have a chance of being unblocked you should say what you are likely to edit about. It is very unlikely that any administrator will unblock you if it seems that you intend to write about yourself again. You will be very welcome to contribute content written from a neutral point of view on topics unrelated to yourself and your work, but Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing personal web pages about oneself, and if that is what you want to do then a social media site or a web hosting service will be more appropriate. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

124.253.87.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Since it seems that you have attempted to evade the block on this account using that IP address, I shall block the IP address too. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okey! I planned to continue with this account... and as I told I am a writer for the known personalities, and I write about their biographies with the proper and official resources. So unless you unblock me, I am not able to proceed further and delete my recent edits or articles and to improve myself. I hereby declare that if I will upload any article (in future), then a suitable link or resource will be provided; which I forgot to provide this time. So its a humble request to kindly unblock as its so tangling OR get me out of this. Please do it as soon as possible, it is been so long I am into this and wasting your time too! ...and moreover I am a writer as I told, and having my International Publications as well, for the refrence you may have it here [1]. Curiousapien (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Curiousapien[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed the reason for your block (spamming), and are wasting time on-wiki with these requests. I'm revoking your talk page access. If you want to appeal, you may do so through WP:UTRS TonyBallioni (talk) 20:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20645 was submitted on Feb 17, 2018 04:50:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20655 was submitted on Feb 18, 2018 09:40:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20659 was submitted on Feb 18, 2018 15:22:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Curiousapien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20662 was submitted on Feb 18, 2018 16:53:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]