User talk:Cupcake547
This is Cupcake547's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2 |
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Index
|
||
Cupcake547 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know why I'm blocked. I never got any warnings or anything. I first realized this when I was trying to respond to my question at the Teahouse. All it says that my IP is blocked and my IP is shared by many many people. It also says that a vandalism only account, Qaw36, used this IP recently but I am not Qaw36. Please unblock Cupcake547. Many thanks, Cupcake547Let's chat! 21:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC).
Decline reason:
This account is not blocked. Please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to edit, so we can find the autoblock which is affecting you. Yamla (talk) 21:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock-auto|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Qaw36". The reason given for Qaw36's block is: "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia".</nowiki>|3=LuK3|4=10525375}}
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Editing news 2021 #2
[edit]Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:List of Major Empires
[edit]Template:List of Major Empires has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)