User talk:Culture759

Anthony Bailey (Interfaith campaigner)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Anthony Bailey (Interfaith campaigner), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Anthony J. Bailey. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Anthony J. Bailey a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Query

With the greatest of respect, are you Anthony Bailey or connected to him in any professional way? I only ask because you appear to be a Single purpose account, adding large unsourced text on past disputes he has had, creating a largely unsourced article on Bailey's wife and reverting my deletion of unsourced text from Bailey's article. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 13 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Dominica Award of Honour page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sisserou Award of Honour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Bailey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Marie-Therese of Hohenberg

I have again reverted your edit to HSH Princess Marie-Therese of Hohenberg's page to remove the superfluous reference to her holding the courtesy title derived from her husband of Lady Bailey.

It is not correct practice amongst European Royal Houses for a married woman to use a title derived from that of her husband where she significantly outranks her spouse as is the case with HSH and her husband Sir Anthony Bailey.

Please see HRH The Princess Royal for a case in point.

Oinky (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Bailey

I have reverted your previous amendments as the reasons given are no acturate . See HRH Princess Alexandra for example. Culture759 (talk) 23:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. —Мандичка^YO 😜 02:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey - honorific and title

Hi. To which country is Bailey accredited, please? I previously thought that his honorific style (Excellency) was because of his having been awarded a 'significant' Grand Cross - which use of Excellency I have found elsewhere; you have taken this from the page, but I cannot find him accredited as a High Commissioner, Ambassador, etc., anywhere. 'Special envoy' means that he was sent, but not that he was received... Thanks.

Having done a little more research, 'Excellency' - in the diplomatic sense - is used for heads of state and heads of delegations (inc. envoy/minister, but not special envoy, which is quite a different thing). I cannot find him listed as an ambassador/diplomat of Montenegro (but perhaps I just cannot find it - a link would perhaps be useful). I cannot readily find any other examples of a special envoy being accorded this style. The style is possibly as a courtesy for a Grand Cross, though, if unusual.

By the way, I'm not sure what you mean by 'rank'; "Excellency" cannot be a rank. In terms of social rank, Bailey is an esquire in the UK (because of his OBE, and similarly to eg foreign nobility); Ireland (constitutionally) has no social rank, and I don't believe that St Kitts does either (after the 1983 constitution).

Sorry, new to all this! Citysider (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding your User signature. The subject is entitled to the use of 'Excellency' by virtue of several honours and positions he holds. First as a Special Envoy with rank of Ambassador at Large for Montenegro. It is not necessary to be accredited to a specific country and in the subject's case it is to a region - the Middle East and North Africa and visits have already happened according to reports to Jordan and Saudi Arabia. The subject is also entitled to use Excellency my virtue of being the holder of the highest rank of a papal honour and i only removed it from the article as part of the editing of the article in light some contributors felt it had lost some of its neutrality and to standardise his various awards. I have added a good number of links to third party sources including Buckingham Palace and the media. The subject is also a holder of the Grand Cross of the Constantinian Order and also is the longstanding Delegate to several nations which under the rules of the Order and the the Church he is also so entitled to use Excellency in the context of his religious order. Rank I was meaning position and role i.e. as envoy and ambassador at large. I also saw somewhere a government release from Antigua and Barbuda of his appointment as Special Envoy to the EU states for economic affairs which also had his position as a HE. Interesting too that Ireland's Government has also recognised his Commonwealth Realm Knighthoods and allowed the use in the Republic of the 'sir' title. As the subject has several nationalities it is my understanding that he may use his Sir title in the UK and therefore is not an esquire.

Welcome to Wikipedia though. I see this is your first contribution. what is your interest in this posting. To me he seems a fascinating man by all accounts and have added just now some links from the Daily Mail newspaperin the UK which first brought him to my attention. Are you UK or US based?Culture759 (talk) 00:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He's an impressive guy! My background is in protocol, so it's very interesting. I'm not sure about the Excellency thing - I think it makes more sense to me certainly as a courtesy for his honours. I'm not sure about the diplomatic status really - he must be a member of a diplomatic corps (of a country) to be a diplomat, and special envoys are not. I can't see that he is. My understanding is that Ireland allowed him to accept the title: I don't know what it means in terms of use. There are only citizens in republics so he cannot be a 'knight' there. (A great example of this is Austria, which doesn't even allow 'von' in surnames!) Likewise in the uk, I think that he must be an esquire, as he is not royal, a peer or a knight. When I just googled this, I got a recent question about something similar in the House of Lords which seems to confirm this. Thanks for the links, though. Interesting reading!

Who else do you know like this? (I just happened to come across this one.) Citysider (talk) 01:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any permissions granted by the Republic of Ireland to Sir Anthony allowing him to use titles granted to him by other Sovereign Powers can only be related to such usage within the territory and jurisdiction of the Republic of Ireland and can only have any validity if he is an Irish Citizen. This permission clearly does not extend to the United Kingdom, so Sir Anthony's practice of using his title whilst in the United Kingdom has to derive either from his being a British Citizen in which case he needs a separate permission granted by the Crown (not his permission granted by the RoI) for him to use a foreign government's honorific title, or, if he holds the nationality of either of the two sovereign states which have invested him with knighthoods, and is not a British Citizen, he may use the honorific "Sir" without further permission from the Crown. I have no idea what nationality or nationalities Sir Anthony has. In neither case of course is the title to be confused with the title of Knight Batchelor or Baronet of the United Kingdom, or of the rank of Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire, which I note Sir Anthony does also hold in a lower rank. Hope that helps. Oinky (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Bailey

Your edit summary was incorrect. Bailey's nationality was not removed. All of my edits were MoS corrections and you should not have mass reverted them. Afterwriting (talk) 13:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey's three nationalities were shown and in your edit it was reduced to one as was the amended title of his wife. Culture759 (talk) 13:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have only just noticed the reference you made to the styles of Princess Elena of Romania in the process of reverting an edit to those of HSH Marie-Therese von Hohenberg. This is incorrect as firstly, Princess Elena does not typically use the courtesy title derived from that of her husband, for the reasons stated as to why HSH Marie-Therese von Hohenberg does not (or should not, if she in fact does) and secondly, if Princess Elena were using a courtesy title derived from that of her husband, it would be Lady Dixon, not Mrs Dixon. Oinky (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are several places where is does show the Romanian princess using here joint title. Why would it be Lady Dixon? She is married to Mr Alexander Nixon so Mrs Nixon is correct. Culture759 (talk)

Apologies - I meant Nixon, rather than Dixon. I have followed the statements in Princess Elena's Wikipedia entry where her husband is named as Lord Alexander Nixon. Elsewhere, he is named as Mr Alexander McAteer, so now I am properly confused as to his true identity. But to the substantive point, it is not a question of technical accuracy - of course Princess Elena is entitled to refer to herself as Princess Elena, Mrs McAteer (or Nixon), if she so chooses. My point is simply that the usual form in this country is for her not to do so. I agree that HRH Princess Alexandra appears as a counter-example, but in point of fact the reason for her continuing to use the subsidiary title of Ogilvy in combination with her royal title was out of respect for her husband's decision as the Hon. Angus Ogilvy, to refuse an earldom offered to him in his own right. It's all a bit of a minefield, but the usual form in this country is to try not to "overdo" these things for fear of looking ridiculous. Oinky (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:John Michael Allen-Petrie in Antigual uniform.jpeg

Hello, Culture759. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:John Michael Allen-Petrie in Antigual uniform.jpeg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add content or create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WM9975 (talk • contribs) 11:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antiguan Knighthood

The UK Government on 1 June 2016 announced a new rule that dual nationals will no longer be able to use in the UK the title Sir or Dame assocated with an honour of knighthood granted by the Queen or her representative the Governor General in one of the 15 Commonwealth Realms. This only refers to the UK jurisdiction and non other. The subject under the statute has entitlment to use it in Antigua, has permission from the Government of Ireland to accept the titular honour and no doubt this is the case for many other juristications. The Knighthood is legitmately awarded by the Crown in Antigua and so on his wikipedia page it should be included especially since the subject holds other nationalities and is professionally and by marriage operates outside of UK juristication. I have however added a note under the awards section of the subject that the title is not formally permitted in the UK since 1 June 2016.. Culture759 (talk)

Anthony Bailey

Please do not keep reinserting "Sir" in the above article. Wikipedia operates according to reliable sources, none of which support your claim. Editing here is a privilege, not a right and persistent violation of our guidelines and policies will result in the suspension of your editing rights. Thank you. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Culture759. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!