User talk:Cuke monster/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cuke monster. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Talk page gibberish
Eh?! CelebHeights 15:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Note: If you actually READ it, and you know who Halbared is, you would know that my comment was NOT "gibberish", but a connection i made on first site of your talk page. You both use Celebheights to create pointless controversies over celebrities' heights. --Cookie 01:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- I've never even come into contact with you here. Look, if you're not mature enough to post properly, maybe you shouldn't post at all. CelebHeights 14:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm thinking a possible sockpuppet. DXRAW 05:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- If you want to talk about possible sockpuppets, I wonder what the result would be if I filed a report between you and the pink panther? CelebHeights 18:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes i would like to talk about sockpuppetry. I believe you and User: Halbared could be sockpuppets. And FYI, me and User: the pink panther are NOT sockpuppets. She is my sister. Also...even if she was my sock, which she isnt, just check the contributions of both my account and hers. Most socks have one account that is used mainly for vandalism--at one point or another--and clearly, these two do not. So whichever you believe--that she is my sister, or my sock--is fine with me. I wont get in trouble, because i dont create edit wars or content disputes. However... Neither you nor User:Halbared seem to be able to say the same, do you? You both constantly create content disputes AND edit wars. Would you like to talk further? We can. Thank you, --Cookie 22:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- We can talk as much as you like, my argumentative friend. If you look at the recent history between me and Halbared, I think you'll have a hard job finding either any evidence for sockpuppetry, or any evidence of me starting edit wars/content disputes for the simple reason that it hasn't happened. CelebHeights 23:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is why i said it was a possibility that you were a sockpuppet.
- Not an obvious sockpuppet. Not a sockpuppet.
- A possible sockpuppet.
- I have checked your edit history.
- And Halbared's edit history.
- As of right now, i do not have sufficient proof that you are sockpuppets.
- Therefore, my suspicions are unprovable.
- Now. I really do want to talk about me and the pink panther, and make it as clear as possible that we are not sockpuppets.
- Do you wish to go further on your claims with this matter?
- If so, contact me, please.
- (Note: I am not argumentative, but merely trying to get some answers. Next time you accuse someone of acting a certain way, please make sure it is accurate.)
Thank you, --Cookie 01:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Next time you accuse someone of acting a certain way, please make sure it is accurate." Ahem, from DXRAW's talk page: That CelebHeights seems like Halbared. I bet they are SOCKPUPPETS. And of course you don't have any proof of sockpuppets. What about edit wars, did you forget to mention you found no proof for that too? CelebHeights 16:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Excuse me... But i believe i told you already, i am not pressing any further on the matter between you and Halbared because i do not have sufficient proof. You just seem likely because you are causing the same problems. Personally, i believe you ARE sockpuppets. But i have nothing to show for my suspicions, other than you cause too much trouble and it is similar on both accounts, but... That isnt what i asked you. I asked you, Are you going to go further on the accusations between me and the pink panther? Thank you, --Cookie 02:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Next time you accuse someone of acting a certain way, please make sure it is accurate." Ahem, from DXRAW's talk page: That CelebHeights seems like Halbared. I bet they are SOCKPUPPETS. And of course you don't have any proof of sockpuppets. What about edit wars, did you forget to mention you found no proof for that too? CelebHeights 16:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- You don't have sufficient proof? You don't have ANY proof. I notice my request for proof of edit wars went unanswered too. Simply for the fact that you annoyed me by posting utter nonsense, I might pursue accusations against you and the pink panther; you seem more likely to be sockpuppets than me and anybody else. CelebHeights 01:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Rude/maddening comments? Could you please direct me to these, or are these accusations as unfounded as the ones you directed about sock puppets? CelebHeights 21:00, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Simply for the fact that you annoyed me by posting utter nonsense, I might pursue accusations against you and the pink panther..."
Two things about that.
You were being pretty rude by saying i "annoyed you by posting utter nonsense". It wasnt nonsense, but questioning sockpuppetry. You cannot accuse someone of sockpuppetry simply for te reason that they "annoyed" you. That is basically a personal attack, not a legitimate accusation. I will now end this conversation, and you'd best do the same, seeing as i'm not able to pursue any further on the sockpuppetry case between you and Halbared and you are not able to pursue an further on the sockpuppetry case between myself and the pink panther. Thank you, it was good talking with you!--Cookie 01:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Cheers, I wish I could say the same. CelebHeights 12:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)