User talk:Cue The Corruption

Cue The Corruption, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Cue The Corruption!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 09:18, Friday, November 22, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

March 2014

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Titanfall, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. czar ♔ 08:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Injustice: Gods Among Us may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halo Xbox One

We've had several new starts for the Halo Xbox One article and the consensus has been to redirect until an announcement with actual details about the game. (See page histories of Halo (2014 video game) and Halo Xbox One.) czar ♔ 02:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Heroine

The Vikings thing is mentioned in the article for "Glory and Gore". The use of "Million Dollar Bills" should be stated in the article for The Love Club EP, as that is the album it is from (MDB only appears on the iTunes extended edition of PH). Adabow (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forza Horizon 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[{Category:Video games developed in the United States]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Combs

See Template:Infobox musical artist#Associated acts, the rapper/singer must have significantly collaborated with Diddy on more then a handful of songs, went on a co-headling tour together or made an entire album together. Notice the restriction that is used with the current people listed. He has made more songs with Bad Boy Records artists French Montana, Red Cafe or King Los, but yet they are not even close enough to being listed. STATic message me! 04:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kendrick Lamar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. STATic message me! 05:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kendrick Lamar and Imagine Dragons. IPadPerson (talk) 06:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm not disrupting, they ARE associated.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cue The Corruption (talk • contribs) 07:22, September 2, 2014‎

Chiming in from the sidelines here,see Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. I know nothing about the relationships involved here, but if further discussion is needed it probably ought to take place on the article's talk page instead of here (see WP:BRD). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Crank characters

added links pointing to Triads and Santa Catalina Island

Chev Chelios

added a link pointing to Brian Taylor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop adding MC Shan to List of artists who reached number one in the United States‎ and to the list of 1993 number-one songs. "Informer" charted as Snow only (no featured artist). You can check the Hot 100 listings in the Billboard magazines during the song's chart run in early 1993 [1]], particularly the March 13 issue, when it hit number one (shown on page 124): [2]. Thanks. - eo (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of artists who reached number one in the United States. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 11:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of artists who reached number one in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 11:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Informer (song). - eo (talk) 11:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Your recent editing history at Linkin Park shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 01:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please consult the the talk page on Linkin Park's article, where we have a discussion about the associated acts section: Talk:Linkin_Park#Associated Acts again!. There was previously a discussion about this and consensus was to omit Stone Temple Pilots, Fort Minor, and DBS. Additionally, Xero is not another band. It was Linkin Park's old name prior to the Bennington's arrival. If you continue to revert edits without achieving a consensus, you will be blocked from editing, regardless if you violate the 3RR rule. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 15:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Tennis Court (song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linkin Park. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 02:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glory and Gore, you may be blocked from editing. Please provide edit summaries explaining your action. See WP:USCHARTS for rules on which charts can be included in tables. It clearly states that if a song has charted on neither Rock Songs nor Rock Airplay you may add Alternative Songs. But, as this song in question did in fact chart on the Rock Songs chart, Alternative Songs chart is not allowed to be included in the table, as it is a component. — ₳aron 09:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Blood (In This Moment album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Remember the Name, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 01:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nu metal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slipknot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Lorde has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Dwpaul ^Talk 23:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreliable sources to Glory and Gore and stop SHOUTING

HĐ (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]