User talk:Cubisticmage626

Welcome!

Hello, Cubisticmage626, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Your request for bot approval

Hi! I noticed that your bot request for approval wasn't transcluded onto the main page - i.e. you missed the last part of step II here. If you don't do that step, nobody will come and review your bot request for approval. Anyway, happy bot writing! APerson (talk!) 22:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from PlayStation 3 with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Ferret. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. You appear to be using random warning templates against editors who have reverted your edits on various articles. Please stop doing so. -- ferret (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Please do not add indiscriminate warnings to user talk pages. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was also very ill-advised. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop wasting our time. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i will not disrupt

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cubisticmage626 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will not disrupt Cubisticmage626 (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So instead of answering the question below... Max Semenik (talk) 04:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you continue disrupting after several warnings, including a final one? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC) i was bord Cubisticmage626 (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

range

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cubisticmage626 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Cubisticmage626 (talk) 04:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

...you decided to waste more of our time - okay, talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 04:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I believe you buddy. You're a political prisoner here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.176.56.5 (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]