User talk:CtrlDPredator

WP:AFL

Hi mate, was wondering if you'd be interested in joining WikiProject AFL. Also take a look at Portal:Australian rules football and Category:VFL/AFL players. Cheers, R o gerthat ^Talk 23:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, CtrlDPredator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! R o gerthat ^Talk 23:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Port Adelaide Football Club

Hey there. I have seen your excellent work reverting incorrect statements regarding PAFC. I have noted that a new user User:Outbackjack has started a new page at Port Power, with Port Power Football Club and Port Adelaide Power Football Club all interlinking. I have redirected all these to the Port Adelaide Football Club page but he has reverted back and sent me a message telling me not to skew the truth. If you could keep an eye on these pages and user as well that would be great. Cheers. --Roisterer 11:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Wood revert at Taj El-Din Hilaly

Please go to the Discusion page at Taj El-Din Hilaly and give your reasoning for reverting my edits to the Douglas Wood section. SmithBlue 08:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More disruption at SpaceX Starship talk page; user reported at ANI

Just wanted to let you know that I've turned User:Redacted II in at WP:ANI for a second time, as they've stirred up even more drama on the talk page for SpaceX Starship. DASL51984 ^{(Speak to me!)} 04:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, he is at it again on the Super_heavy-lift_launch_vehicle where he is trying to argue that we should list a suborbital flight as orbital for no valid reason. It is driving me insane. CtrlDPredator (talk) 16:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Your recent editing history at Super heavy-lift launch vehicle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Redraiderengineer (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Redraiderengineer I understand and I don't really know what the best course of action is from here. I don't want to have to drag a third party into this for something so trivial and I feel entirely discouraged from contributing on any page that relates to Starship because I always get a replies from this individual.

I would appreciate your opinion. CtrlDPredator (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]