User talk:Ctrconstgovt

Welcome!

Hello, Ctrconstgovt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 76.248.151.159 (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 76.248.151.159. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 76.248.151.159 (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rich Gordon may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

In June 2012, the Speaker named Gordon Chairman of the powerful Committee on Rules.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asmdc.org/members/a24/press/assemblyman-gordon-appointed-to-chair-assembly-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Your reinsertion of trivia, campaign puff and the like in this BLP is improper. Please read and abide by the WP:BLP policy, Cheers. Collect (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, talk. The community certainly appreciates your efforts to monitor for POV. At the same time, it is not POV to cite major, credible publications that say something positive about a living person. For example, if the New York Times states, "Gabrielle Giffords showed courage in recovering from her gunshot wound," then it is perfectly permissible to state in her encyclopedia entry that, "The New York Times hailed Gifford's courage in recovering from her injury." That statement, is, by itself, a fact. Let's not get too enthusiastic or it will lessen the ability of editors to ever repeat anything that a source said that was positive.

User:Quac needs to read Wikipedia's BLP policies, which state: "Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone." Strip mining a page of all praise, especially that from mainstream editorial boards, is the sign of an agenda.

"Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone." Please keep in mind that, if you look at the edit history for Mike Gatto, I am not the only one who made substantial edits. There are editors here willing to cooperate and discuss alternatives, but throwing around accusations and user warnings on my talk page is not productive. See WP:ATWV. -Quac (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ctrconstgovt. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 04:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, have you seen this? Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Mike_Gatto --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EW

Please be aware of this policy, and the ramifications it may have on you. You have now reached WP:3RR in a 24 hour period, and any further reverts in a short period will likely be viewed as contrary to Wikipedia policies about "edit war" and may result in you being blocked from Wikipedia or banned from a topic. Please consider this before making any further reverts on Mike Gatto or related pages. This is the official warning. Cheers. Collect (talk) 11:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]