User talk:Ctkeene

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PostgreSQL

I reverted your edit to PostgreSQL, on the grounds that (1) Wavemaker is not a "Database administration front-end" for PostgreSQL, which is the section you added your content to; in fact, Wavemaker appears to have nothing specifically to do with PostgreSQL (2) Your contributions to WP seem to center on adding links and content related to Wavemaker. Of course that's not a crime, but the pattern is certainly clear. Neilc (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't object to adding a link to Wavemaker as part of a list of PostgreSQL-related tools (perhaps as a separate article), but it doesn't seem related enough to PostgreSQL to warrant a whole subsection. Neilc (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 18:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What in the world are you talking about? I am the CEO of an open source software company Wavemaker. I made an edit on the MS Access page in the section listed MS Access Alternatives. I then added alternatives sections to two similar products Lotus Notes, PowerBuilder, adding not just the WaveMaker link but also several others of open source alternatives to these products. These are old proprietary RAD platforms that people are wanting to find alternatives for, particularly open source alternatives. These products came from [[1]] which is the top Google hit for MS Access alternatives. If it is ok to have alternatives on the MS Access, why is it spam to add similar sections for similar products? I got started on this after participating on a thread at [Overflow] - now I'm sorry I tried Ctkeene (talk) 19:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Ctkeene[reply]

The article is on MS Access, not alternatives. Wikipedia is not a directory. Consider finding ways to contribute rather than just promoting a product that you're the CEO of. Imagine what this encyclopedia would be like if others' contributions were so limited. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 01:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]