User talk:Csák

Welcome!

Hello, Csák, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Giant Snowman 19:06, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Tamás Eszes (politician)

Well, it seems your deletion nomination was unsuccessful. Of course, if you had just left the original redlink alone on the Recent deaths article as others do, then it would have been deleted after one month. But no, you needed to make a point, right? What was that message you left on my talk page? Oh, that's right: Hahahaha. WWGB (talk) 07:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States Grand Prix

It is long standing Wikipedia practice not not alter results tables until events are completed. It is one of the principles of Wikipedia that events are not anticipated but recorded. --Falcadore (talk) 11:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Majd ha megmutatod a szabályok között, akkor. Addig ne vandálkodj az információk törölgetésével. Crufjsa (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

És a 2008-2011 közötti szakasszal mégis mi a bajod? az se történt még meg? Röhejes vagy. Crufjsa (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I don't understand that. This discussion may help your understanding. --Falcadore (talk) 13:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

google translator is your friend

So is typing in English. Wikipedia is a collaborative process. Why is waiting so difficult? Every other Grand Prix article in Wikipedia does not update until after the race. --Falcadore (talk) 00:10, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szerinted 2010 még nem múlt el? 2011?? Gondolkozz már egy picit! Crufjsa (talk) 08:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you AGAIN to read this discussion. This is why these not held rows are not added until the next race is held. So please cease unproductive edit warring. --Falcadore (talk) 13:16, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are unwilling to work with other editors or read advice here is the summary. Have a look at the French Grand Prix article. The French Grand Prix has not been held since 2008, but we do not add "Not held rows" to indicate that there has been no race since 2008 it simply stops. The Dutch Grand Prix has not been held since 1985. The Norwegian since 1936. Rhodesian Grand Prix was last held in 1976 and the country no longer exists. We do not put in "not held" because we would just be adding a year, each year, for NO REASON. It stops at the most recent year held because that works just as effectively as indicating the race has not been held.

So PLEASE STOP. --Falcadore (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States Grand Prix. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TreyGeek (talk) 13:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Kurume Best Amenity Cup – Singles may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]