User talk:Crystalcrusader
I have posted a message!!
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lorelol, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JavaTenor 05:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated Lorelol, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Lorelol satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorelol and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lorelol during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JavaTenor 22:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)