User talk:Cryogenicity

Cryogenicity, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cryogenicity! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm Jauerback. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Brendan Dassey, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there was acyually a whole series of edits, which you reverted in one go. Much of it was just tidying a messy article that appeared as if duplicated by two people not working together. I also removed factually incorrect unsourced sentences that you've reinstated without a source. Can you help this mess by only reverting the specific sentences you feel need an additional source? (if they're not uncontroversial undisputed right? Not every sentence even on a bio has a source). Cryogenicity (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, pretty much any statement, especially in a BLP needs to be sourced; controversial or not. So, if I restored an unsourced statement, feel free to remove it. I would suggest reading up on WP:BLP, WP:RS, and WP:OR. Any specific questions, you can either start a discussion on the article's talk page or try WP:BLPN. I don't personally have an interest in the article itself, so I'm not trying to stop you from making changes. Just make sure they're sourced. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No BLP specifies "material challenged or likely to be challenged". You haven't answered which specific sentences you were reverting as likely to be challenged. Cryogenicity (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a contentious bio. If you'd like, I can remove every sentence that is not supported by a source and you can work your way from there. Would you prefer that method? Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 00:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like you to stop taking content providers for granted and reinstate the tidying up I did preliminary to being able to sensibly improve the article factually, and if you won't clarify why the undisputed facts I corrected/added need a source I will ask at the talk page. Cryogenicity (talk) 09:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to restore it. Just make sure any statement you add has a source to back it up. It's not complicated. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 11:56, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I report you for misrepresenting that every single statement needs a source? And for deleting those edits which were just tidying up a messy article. Cryogenicity (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

==

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

==

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Cryogenicity (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]