User talk:Crymsonwynters

Welcome!

Hello, Crymsonwynters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dartslilly (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Joint Chiefs of Staff, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Job titles are lowercase except in specific circumstances. See MOS:JOBTITLES or discuss on a talk page, please. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 12:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the manual of style, under the "Capital letters" section, it clearly states that, "Standard or commonly used names of an office are treated as proper names", and proceeds to list examples such as "Prime Minister of Great Britain". In keeping with this style, as my edits were to standard office titles and not general ones (including Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretary of Defense, and President, all referring to standard US offices), I capitalized these office titles. Keeping these titles lowercase in reference to "Job Titles" is incorrect due to the non-general nature of the offices. Seeing as how these are US-sanctioned titles established in the US Code, they should be capitalized. To keep them lowercase is incorrect, unprofessional in it's "look", and misrepresentative of the importance of each office, among other reasons. Crymsonwynters (talk) 01:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Crymsonwynters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page United States Air Force Academy Cadet Wing did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

USAFA Cadet Wing

Okay I can definitely understand removing the squadron sayings for a lack or verifiability but if you aren't going to take my word as a cadet, then I wouldn't include squadron sayings at all (i.e. squadron 2 and squadron 5 which also have unreferenced squadron sayings.)

Additionally, you removed my edits on the Class Exemplar section, which I didn't appreciate since I literally cited the reference where those edits came from (which is the same reference used for about 15 other exemplars). I appreciate your edits on the squadron sayings, but it seems to me that you just erased all of my edits without checking all of them.

Crymsonwynters (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crymson, you know what? You're right. I didn't check all 32 edits to find the one edit out of that mass change that had a primary source. I apologize. If you want to restore that information, I have no objection. I'm sure you'll be more careful of the Core Content Policies in the future. Thanks and I hope that helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]