User talk:Crybabywaaa

September 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Marsh Hawk Press—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duke Energy Center for the Performing Arts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DB1729^talk 06:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tug of War (film), you may be blocked from editing. DB1729^talk 06:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:EvergreenFir. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 06:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More to come later! Should have let me have my own way I only wanted rid of two unnecessary sentences was all this really worth it just to one up an edit! Crybabywaaa (talk) 06:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason=Your reason here Crybabywaaa (talk) 06:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

Not good enough opinions are not needed I will keep fighting.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crybabywaaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Crybabywaaa (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. Your other statements here suggest unblocking you would have no benefit to the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you going to let me have my own way and remove those opinions? Or should I continue with all of this.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crybabywaaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

those opinions have no benefit to Wikipedia so how about you remove them and I will remove myself and not bother you again? Crybabywaaa (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have a better idea. How about we keep you blocked forever. PhilKnight (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock|reason=As you wish, let the games and accounts continue! Crybabywaaa (talk) 11:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crybabywaaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As you wish, let the games and accounts continue! Crybabywaaa (talk) 2:13 pm, Today (UTC+3)

Decline reason:

Your talk page access has been revoked. If you for some reason decide to mature and keep using the account, file an unblock request through UTRS. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 11:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Ts4221 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ts4221. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]