User talk:Crushweb

Regarding Cassiopeia (Encantadia) article

Actually, it wasn't me who created and expanded the article. You can observe the history page. My edits are just pure format correction and sometimes spelling correction. Anyway, I tagged the article for cleanup so that anyone who has time can improve it. Cheers! :) --Jojit fb 06:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Encantadia

Hey there, Crushweb / Animus_ESTE. Seen your articles and episode summaries. We can use your style and skills on WikiProject Encantadia. Join up at the project page here. Mercury McKinnon 03:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Crushweb. Could you please post a link to where you Etheria episode summaries can be read? I think that would be a very helpful resource to include on our project page (under the Resources section). Thanks! Mercury McKinnon 03:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Vargas

I'm replying to your query to Lucky 6.9, as he's away from Wikpedia for the next couple of months.

This article has been created three times. The first time, the article consisted of five words: "naked body of Alfred Vargas". Not surprisingly, it was deleted. The second time, the article started with "hi alfred" and went on in a non-English language. Again, it was deleted. The third time was created by you, and while this time it actually made some sense, it was written in a very "fannish" manner, beginning "Both on-screen and off-screen Alfred Vargas is making girls swoon". This looked to Lucky 6.9 like a probable copyright violation from some promoter, and even if it wasn't, it was completely unencyclopedic in tone. Accordingly, he deleted it, and I would have done so as well.

Because the article had been created three times with unsuitable content, Lucky blocked the article from being created again.

If you wish to create a more encyclopedic article, please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies) and WP:NPOV, and then post at least the first paragraph of the proposed article either here, on Lucky 6.9's talk page, or on my talk page, and if it's reasonable, he or I will remove the block so the article can be created.-gadfium 04:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That looks fine. I've removed the block on article creation, so you can copy that content into the article.-gadfium 00:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crushweb, I've just now gotten online and saw your message. Looks like you didn't need any help handling this. Carry on. Mercury McKinnon 01:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juvila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juvila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juvila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]