User talk:Crusher1
Film cover fur
[edit]I saw your edit to Template talk:Film cover fur. Would you like to explain yourself a bit more clearly, please? I don't understand why you compare this template to the deprecated Template:Filmr and why it should have a navbox, and what should be in this navbox. Debresser (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Upper left corner, (V)iew this Template, (D)iscuss this Template, (E)dit this Template --Crusher1 (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have no idea, sorry. Perhaps somebody else will understand you and be able to fix it. Debresser (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Look at the template here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Broadway_danny_rose.jpg or here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crusher1, as the nav box does not show on the template page. --Crusher1 (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, ok. I'll look into it. Debresser (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Look at the template here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Broadway_danny_rose.jpg or here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crusher1, as the nav box does not show on the template page. --Crusher1 (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have no idea, sorry. Perhaps somebody else will understand you and be able to fix it. Debresser (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
The difference is that File:Broadway danny rose.jpg uses a navbox indeed, while Template:Film cover fur uses Template:Non-free use rationale which is a table. And frankly speaking, since all 30 or so non-free use rationale templates are basically of that same build, I would be reluctant to change any one of them. Debresser (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Too bad, was an elegant way to save a step. Thanks for the explanation. --Crusher1 (talk) 00:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)