User talk:Crowtow849

Welcome!

Hello, Crowtow849, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 13:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1rr

Hey, just letting you know that Turkish military intervention in Afrin is under a 1rr restriction, which means you can only revert once per day. Violate this and have someone in a bad mood catch you, well you could get blocked. Actually you've already reverted at least twice. My point here isn't to report you, just letting you know. Anyhow, I'm about to delete the entire section of the lede, as the whole thing is misleading -- the only country that actually has something resembling a clear stance among those listed is France, all the others had their statements cherrypicked. --Calthinus (talk) 04:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Galatz ^Talk 19:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally its not his opinion that its redundant, per WP:OLINK, by WP policy it is. - Galatz ^Talk 19:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

You were already warned not to edit I/P conflict articles till you reach 500 edits.I will report you if you will edit again.--Shrike (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samah Sabawi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Nazi boycott of 1933

Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Allan Leonard Frederick Stevens, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Would you please stop overlinking? This is not the first this had been mentioned to you. We don't need to repeat Saskatchewan, Canada twice in quick succession, let alone link both occurrences of each. Meters (talk) 04:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What Meters said. Please have a look at MOS:OVERLINK in particular: well-known major geographic features such as countries need not be linked. --HyperGaruda (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm Pharaoh of the Wizards. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to National Iranian American Council seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at DJ Khaled. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Work permit (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2018 (UTC)~~ > I have replied back to your claim of vandalism on your talk page Crowtow849 (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are changing geographical locations to political dynasty's. Please discuss.Work permit (talk) 05:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Alliance of the periphery. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

you are topic banned for one month from all edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly contrued

You have been sanctioned because of your disruptive editing, including 1RR and 500/30 violations.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Doug Weller talk 14:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Crowtow849. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Crowtow849. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]