User talk:Crossleague

Hi,

I noticed that you added India as a new ecclesiastical district outside the Philippines. I still can't see it in INCmedia.org. I believe India can't support an E.D. for they only have very few congregations and GWS. Do you have a valid source that will tell us otherwise?

Thanks.

Fcbelmontejr (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Crossleague, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hans5958 / Hans T.M ║ Lets Talk! ║ Sign my Guestbook! 14:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

June 2015

Hello, I'm JoeSperrazza. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Iglesia ni Cristo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JoeSperrazza (talk) 21:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm WikiLeon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Iglesia ni Cristo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 02:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's verifiable. Stop your biased pro-INC editing.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Iglesia ni Cristo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Ironbrew (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed a number of your recent edits to Iglesia ni Cristo does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! w^L^{<speak·check>} 22:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

stop it

Stop reinserting inappropriate blog reviews - we only use reliably published sources with professional reviews. Also stop inserting trivial fancruftian divisions of the cast : we identify main cast and supporting cast only, and certainly dont hagiography the characters as "pioneers" -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#Critical_response we only use professional reviews. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i urge you to actually read the WP:NPOV policy, particularly the parts about where we do not attempt to create a false balance by presenting non-mainstream opinions as if they are equal to the professionals. .-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Felix Manalo (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]