User talk:Cromwells Legacy

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! Wmahan . 18:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

I'm sorry, but it seems you apparently left a warning on my talk page which, I gather, you actually meant to place on your own talk page. Might want to fix that.—Nat Krause^(Talk!) 18:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three Revert Rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. HawkerTyphoon 18:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me on this. You broke it - four reverts to a previous state of the article in 24 hours. Don't do it again. HawkerTyphoon 18:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first is not a revert. Plus I invited users to talk page. Now reverts were stopped by you. 3RR blocking are only as a preventive measure, see here: WP:3RR. Cheers, --Cromwells Legacy 18:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was the first revert - you reverted to a previous state of the article, after Jmabel added the American part in. Let's mark this out:

Jmabel adds it in
You remove it (one revert for you)
Nat Krause adds it (one for him)
You remove (two)
Nat Krause adds it (two for him)
You remove (three)
Nat Krause adds it (three for him)
You remove (four)
He adds it one more time (four for him)
I remove them both:-)

HawkerTyphoon 18:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm sorry but I bite newcomers more than other people, because once someone is bitten, they don't do it again. You can quote policies all you like, but I can quote WP:IAR - :P As long as you two have worked it out, don't break the rules again. You know them apparently, so you also know that it's the spirit of the rule you've broken. Happy editing. HawkerTyphoon 18:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Would you please explain your reasoning at Robert Morris (merchant) rather than reverting without comment? As I explained in the edit summary, WP:MOSBIO clearly says to use the nationality of a person when he or she became notable. I doubt you'd argue he was notable before he was 13, when he moved to the US. Wmahan . 20:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Transnistrian referendum, 2006

Please refrain from introducing POV edits to the article in question such as you did recently. In particular, pay attention to the article talk page, which says straight away:

This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute.
Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure you supply full citations when adding information to highly controversial articles.

That warning is there for a reason. -- int19h 14:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transnistria is a hot topic and there are people who don't like the truth. They say to discuss in the talk page any change you want to add, but afterwards they delete the proposals even from talk pages [1]--MariusM 23:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]