User talk:Crompton editz

November 2022

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bhagat Singh Koshyari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Sudheendra Kulkarni. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sudheendra Kulkarni, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 22:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hizbul Mujahideen seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 23:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlellos Swelle

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Carlellos Swelle, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chotulal Rane

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Chotulal Rane, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxes

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiv Sena (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shiv Sena (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Made by mistake Crompton editz (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Shivaji, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 14:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was by mistake Crompton editz (talk) 14:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and vandalised edits

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray), from next time you will be blocked from editing and this is your last warning! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Crompton editz (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are biased not allowing to attach logo in Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena even if it is sourced.Promoting liberal. Crompton editz (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image originally appears in the video posted by son of Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde,Dr Shrikant Shinde on twitter.

https://twitter.com/DrSEShinde/status/1579836800473833473?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1579836800473833473%7Ctwgr%5Eb7d281d89f64ea6c540522243fe5deb77bda4a67%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthepipanews.com%2Findex.php%2F2022%2F10%2F12%2Fvideo-balasaheb-in-name-dharmaveer-in-song-shinde-clan-starts-fighting-with-shield-and-sword-thepipanews%2F

Crompton editz (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

let find biased politics Crompton editz (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons only accept own work image The logo was copyrighted by twitter And You must not vandalise pages like by saying it Sonia Sena, seats reduction etc . Administrator will soon block you as I have filled complaint against You for your vandalised Edits Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have not done seat reduction Crompton editz (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are a biased left winger why don't you seek copyright from Twitter on behalf of me.You seem to be a staunch supporter/Pidhi of Khangress.Leave Wikipedia and become a Fakir instead. Crompton editz (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radical Mulla Crompton editz (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You stooped and bowed to Sonia Gandhi Shameless Crompton editz (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must be illegitimate Mulla child Crompton editz (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maha Yuti

Hello, Crompton editz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Maha Yuti for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 16:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption including inappropriate article creation, battleground attitude, incivility and WP:SOAP/WP:RGW edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your cut and paste additions of unrelated content to this page are disruptive. You retain access to this page in order to make an appeal of your block, not to continue being disruptive.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crompton editz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it was done by mistake I didn't practice editing well in sandbox and motive wasn't to disrupt. Crompton editz (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivsena Office Dadar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kanik Shah

Hello, Crompton editz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kanik Shah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Supremo(party)

Hello, Crompton editz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Supremo(party), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atul Sawant

Hello, Crompton editz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atul Sawant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kanik Shah

Hello, Crompton editz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kanik Shah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Supremo(party)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Supremo(party) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]