User talk:CrniBombarder!!!

Sorry, није ми изгледало као да си имао намеру да га бацаш на енглески :) БТВ, можда би требали да комуницирамо на језику домородаца кад смо на овој Вики (Кад си у Риму, понашај се као Римљанин...) - чисто да се неко не увреди? -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 14:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Was the Cetina-Una line the historic border of Croats and Serbs in the Early Medieval Ages? HolyRomanEmperor 17:03, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It is to my believe, though, that the region between Bosna and Una was a region almost equally inhabitted by Croats and Serbs. When Serbia would include Bosnia, Croats became a minority, and when Croatia would include Bosnia, Serbs became a minority... right? HolyRomanEmperor 20:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When did the Serbs start to appear in the Frontier region (Lika, Banija, Kordun...)? HolyRomanEmperor 20:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But what I don't understand is that there were Krka, Krupa and that D... seven centuries ago! Long before the Ottomans... If there were no Serbs there, why were they made? HolyRomanEmperor 22:08, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I meant Serbian Orthodox monasteries Krka, Krupa and Dragović :))) They're almost seven hundred years old. Krka was raised by Emperor Dushan's sister, Countess Hellena Šubić of Bribir, wife of Pavao Šubic. HolyRomanEmperor 13:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I precisely meant to say that there was an "island" of Serbs in the Krka region back then... HolyRomanEmperor 14:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vote

Help preserve the Serbian Greek Confederation Article(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_Greek_Empire). Whether you think it ought to be deleted or not, will be up to you ;however, I believe that you, like myself recognize at least the validity of many of the facts that it presents, and that you will vote keep. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Serbian_Greek_Empire_2 Dumanov

Your vote certianly has helped! Thanks! Dumanov

Matej Ninoslav

I saw on sr wiki that you added the info on that Bosnian Ban. Could you find me a source for that part were it mentionens that he was a Serb (i. e. the part when he was forcibly converted to a Catholic?) And what do you think about the article now: Matej Ninoslav? --HolyRomanEmperor 23:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK; I'll be waiting. HolyRomanEmperor 21:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pa ti dodaj onda (ja nemam vrijemena)! --HolyRomanEmperor 12:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Дозвола

Па није баш са званичног сајта града. Тај списак се вуче около, видео сам га и у некој књизи, и ко зна ко је први аутор. Свеједно, у питању су догађаји за које је јасно да су најважнији за историју града па око њиховог избора ни не може пуно да се стави под ауторско право а ја нисам баш буквално преводио а понешто сам и додао. Нема никакве дозволе за коришћење... Nikola 06:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of English

Hey,

Can I suggest on user talk pages you use English, if anythinf for the sake of transparency? Computerjoe 's talk 15:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Costantine Bodin

Ahh... you've made a mess. Why did you move the article to this name when he reigned under a different one too? Please discuss before making controversial moves, now we have to get an administrator to move it back to its original location. Todor →Bozhinov 18:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So he reigned under two names, "Constantine Bodin of Duklja" and "Peter III of Bulgaria", and he is known under both. Todor →Bozhinov 08:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golubac

Hi! I've been trying to expand the English article, and much of the information I have now is from the Serbian article, which looks like it was written mostly by you. Any chance you remember where you found the information, so I can cite it when I add it here? Thanks, -Bbik 02:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And don't worry about it taking so long -- things happen, not a big deal. And besides, late is better than never! -Bbik 02:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No

No, no, no... NEMANJA made him give it up. --PaxEquilibrium 20:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Željko Fajfrić. --PaxEquilibrium 13:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miz 1990.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Miz 1990.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mizar ku.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mizar ku.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mizar sd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mizar sd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Str cdg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Str cdg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to International recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nixeagle (talk • contribs) 14:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Šar Mountains

Hello Crni. Thank you for adding the etymology of the mountains' name. If you could add a reference indicating this etymology, it would be most appreciated (it is also required by our Verifiability policy). Does your source also indicate some reason for naming the mountains in this way ?

Furthermore, when you have the source at hand, you may consider adding this fact to the article on the orb (globus cruciger). A simple sentence would suffice... something along the lines of: "The Šar Mountains are named after the Serbian word for orb, šar (шар)." - Best regards, Ev (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crni. I have replied at my talk page. - Regards, Ev (talk) 20:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Ljeviš

Da, sada sam i ja video da je dopisano, ali to nije istina, Milka Čanak-Medić, i Marica Šuput, naši znameniti istoričari istorije srednjevekovne arhitekture ne pominju ilirske temelje. Ni Deroko ne pominje. Verovatno albanska propaganda opet.

Molio bih te da obrišeš taj podatak, nije istinit. Hval unapred!

Tadija (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Maritsa/Chernomen

What do you want exactly for a reference concerning Bulgarians at the Battle of Maritsa/Chernomen? Would this[1] be acceptable? --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Location of of Pančić's Peak

You have previously contributed to the Pančić's Peak article. Please see my comment at Talk:Pančić's Peak#Central Serbia or Kosovo. --Bejnar (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP page moving on Đakovica

What is this guy doing? he keeps moving the page and edit warring, iv'e already reverted twice, can I continue to help revert him or will i be told off for going over 3rr, as this IP is disruptive and I want to help you--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 13:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]