User talk:Crixxx

June 2009

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Black Rock Congregational Church, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Black Rock Congregational Church

A few friendly suggestions on Black Rock Congregational Church. If you don't like the maintenance templates in the article (and it's not your article - see WP:OWN), then instead of reverting until you get blocked, then making a new account to avoid the block, just do the requested work.

Also, long lists of church staff, quoting the entire Doctrinal Statement and the Mission Statement are not appropriate to an encyclopedia and also copyright violations. Instead, interested readers will simply click through to the church's website. (And if those items are not easy to find on the official website, the church might consider redesigning it.)

Also, read MOS:IMAGES#Images. The way the first image is now meets the MOS -- your version does not.

Hope that helps.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for removal of maintenance templates and block evasion. Take some time during this block to read through the advice I offered above and take it to heart. I hope you'll decide to become a productive contributor after this time off. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Fabrictramp

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crixxx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked by the user Fabrictramp for restoring the page as I originally designed and authored it. Fabrictramp repeatedly altered my design and content, and I responded by restoring it to its original configuration every time it was disrupted. How can I be considered a vandal of my own work after someone has decided to disrupt the article as I, the author, originally intented it to be posted?

Decline reason:

Hello Crixxx. You were blocked for unexplained removal of maintenance templates. Unexplained reversions of editors without discussion, in most cases, constitutes edit warring, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Also, judging by your request, I believe you have some sense of ownership of your contributions. We, as contributors, don't own or get to control the content we add to Wikipedia. 'Authors' of an article don't get any special standing in content decisions on articles simply because they created the page. I am happy to unblock you if you can confirm to me you have read and understood both Wikipedia:Edit war and Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, if you are the original author, the you are the same as User:BRCC, which means you might want to read WP:COI.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Crixxx. You have new messages at Backslash Forwardslash's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)