User talk:Cristina Butunoi

Tataru

You;ve asked my opinion. I therefore must give you not my own view of what WP ought to do, but my estimate, based on many years of experience here about what is likely to work here, and what is not. I've read the preceding articles and the sources(in Google translation) . Fundamentally, my judgement remains what it was before: I think that it will be decided that neither he nor his company sufficiently important yo meet out notability standards. It will be of no use to you if i do not give to you realistic advice, and I am fairly sure that if you added them to wikipedia they would not survive a deletion discussion. The sources to me seem (based on the google translations) not like objective newspaper & magazine articles, but promotional interviews where he is allowed to say whatever he pleases . But if you wish to try an article, which should you try--the person or the firm. The only advantage of doing the article on the person is the added notability from being vice president of the Romanian branch of IIA. I don't think that's significant--it might be if it were president. The advantage of starting with the company is that the company already has an article in the Romanian WP. [1] We are likely to give a certain degree of tolerance to that situation, that we are unlikely to give to an individual who is not even covered by his nationalWP.

I cannot exactly predict what will happen. It will probably not be speedy deleted, but it probably will go for an afd discussion. What happens in such discussions is to some extent a matter of chance and participation. This will not be an obvious case, and either result is possible. If you want to go ahead, go ahead, but realize that an adverse decision will probably mean you will never be able to get an article on either. Good luck with it. DGG ( talk ) 08:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to look at a revised version, post it a a Draft in our new Draft space, and tell me about it. DGG ( talk ) 08:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have edited the text and found some new sources. I understand your point of view, please know that I appreciate your help and support and any piece of advice is welcome. You will find it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Cristina_Butunoi/sandbox/Felix_Tataru .

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Tataru (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Felix Tataru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cristina Butunoi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Felix Tataru concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Felix Tataru, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Felix Tataru

Hello, Cristina Butunoi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Felix Tataru".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Felix Tataru}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]