User talk:Crispsoaks

Welcome!

Hello, Crispsoaks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 04:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never Have I Ever

Hello buddy. I have seen that you are interested in contributing to the article Never Have I Ever (TV series), but here I have to tell you the following, Ramona and Lee are NOT actresses of the main cast, even though they both have a lot of weight in the main plot of the program. The world is not going to end due to the fact that they are not protagonists, with a second season perhaps the production makes them part of the main cast, but this has not happened yet. Now, the fact that they appear on the poster does NOT make them protagonists, first of all because their names are not mentioned or anything, on Netflix that happens, I give you as an example the series The Order, where Adam DiMarco appears in one of his posters, and only him, and he is NOT the protagonist. Likewise, you put the order of the cast by the order that you like, at the beginning of the episode they are credited in the way I have left in the edition, and it is because the production of the program decided so. You must wait for an official statement on whether both actresses of the program were part, otherwise, you must stop vandalizing the article for wanting to put both as main actresses when they do not. I hope you read and meditate and see that information that is not true should not be placed.

--Dru alexandro (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my concern if there are one or more users who, according to what you say, are using false accounts to revert to you, understand, the posters are NOT official sources, stop posting false information, not only am I the one who is reversing your erroneous editions, also Other users with many editions that prove they are not fake accounts, stop now. --Dru alexandro (talk) 02:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:CLCStudent‎. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Stop with the accusations of sockpuppetry. CLCStudent has over 200,000 edits on Wikipedia and is a respected editor. If you think someone is using multiple accountss, report them to WP:SPI if you have actual evidence, which doesn't include disagreeing with you. Doug Weller talk 04:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never Have I Ever again and false accusations

I find it inappropriate and annoying that you are using this means to defame me, I have not made any other account to reverse your edits, that is something that bothers me that you are assuming, just look at the IP address of both accounts and voila. In addition, I am tired that you go out with the same pretext of the poster, understand, it is not an official source because it is a poster only, in which not even any of the 3 actresses is accredited. And the order in which the actors are credited is stipulated by the production at the time the episode begins. Please, for these editions, you have accused me of false identity and that is serious, more because of your multiple reversions in an article can lead to a permanent block for violating the rules of Wikipedia. --Dru alexandro (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Your recent editing history at Never Have I Ever (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather ^{please leave a message...} 09:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never Have I ever.

Will you stop reverting your wrong edits. Users all over the world can read the history page of never have I ever. You keep accusing other users of being sock puppets. Stop it now! You are making edits based on a poster that isn't valid. One Google search and it can be concluded that only some actors are shown on it, but the names aren't actually on the posters. I checked Netflix and that other user had valid points which seems to be okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factcheck2020 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. _wjemather ^{please leave a message...} 15:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.