User talk:Crimson Observer

Welcome!

Hello, Crimson Observer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Djegan 18:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Hi there. I read your question on the newcomers help page. there are several ways to create external links, eg:

Writing http://www.google.com will produce this: http://www.google.com

Writing [http://www.google.com] will produce this: [1]

Writing [http://www.google.com Google search engine] will produce this: Google search engine

I hope that helps. If not, feel free to ask me any questions on my talk page. - Akamad 21:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IDA Ireland

Hello, please read Talk:IDA Ireland and Wikipedia:Copyrights before submitting any external material. Its an easy oversight to make, by submitting copyrighted material, so please be aware of the policy when submitting. Djegan 23:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Higgins

I have reverted your recent edit to Joe Higgins, because it did not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy (see WP:POV). It would be acceptable for a Wikipedia article to quote a range of views on Higgins's stance, which may include sourced and referenced comments that his actions "demonstrated a brazen contempt for the rule of law" or that the people involved were "so-called Asylum seekers" … provided that the quotes used reflected a fair balance of the coverage. However, unbalanced assessments do not fit the requirement that "All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias" --BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 22:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ledwith

It maybe worth starting an article on Ledwith as you appear to have amassed a resonable amount of information in the Maynooth College article - and thus remove the information from the Maynooth College article and provide a link to the Ledwith affair. Djegan 20:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming articles

Hi, and welcome to the encyclopedia! I've noticed you've been adding some good content on Irish politicians, and wanted to say thanks and offer a suggestion for the future. According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people), it's generally a bad idea to include titles like 'Councillor' in the title of an article, as such titles have a tendency to change when a politician gains higher office / loses that office, and the titles of articles should aim to be as 'timeless' as possible. I've noticed that Seán Barrett was moved to Seán Barrett (Irish politician) to distinguish it from all the other Sean Barretts, and I myself moved Councillor Eugene Regan SC to Eugene Regan. All the best, Ziggurat 22:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JFK Birth

I deleted your edit in the article 1917 in Ireland about the birth of JFK, as it was not an event that happened in Ireland. --Tuspm ^{Talk | E-Mail Me} 23:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Neary (disambiguation)

Hi there. You created a disambiguation page for Michael Neary at the name Othernames (disambiguation). I think you must have meant to create the page at the proper title of Michael Neary (disambiguation), and then put the {{othernames}} template on the current Michael Neary article to link there. Not to worry, I've fixed it all up, but I thought I'd let you know. -- SCZenz 22:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. If there's anything else you need help with, just let me know. -- SCZenz 05:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)—[reply]

Mícheál Ó'Domhnaill

You changed the birthplace of Mícheál Ó'Domhnaill from Kells to Dublin and also his age from 54 to 53. Do you have a source for this? The Irish Times and The Herald both have his age at 54. A couple of biographies ([2], [3], [4]), none really authoritative, have his birthplace as Kells. Now it could be that all of those sources are wrong about his age and birthplace, but if so I'd like to give an authoritative source. --Craig Stuntz 17:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duf 20:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)I used the obituary details published in The Irish Times last Saturday (Jul 15) which quoted DOB as October 7 1952. I would presume this to be properly authenticated.[reply]

Micheal O'Domhnaill obituary

Thanks for the reply. I can only get the regular Irish Times via ProQuest, not the Saturday edition, but I see the first sentence in ireland.com's search results. As the Irish Times appears to have published two different ages and hasn't corrected the first article, I'm going to keep looking for another source. RTÉ also had the 54 age, for whatever it's worth. --Craig Stuntz 20:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duf OK. The Times also stated the place of birth as Kells

Vere Wynne-Jones

Your article on Vere Wynne-Jones is lifted virtually wholesale from The Irish Times. I'm marking it as a Copyright violation. It'll be deleted and will have to be rewritten. Ian Cheese 13:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

I've helped format the references you use in your articles. However, you may want to learn how to make multiple uses of the same cite. It can make articles look really nice. If you need any help, you can just put a note on my talk page. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Test

agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

Template

I removed the template because it had been discussed on WP:TFD, and the end result of the disucssion was that the template should be deleted. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 23:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you refer me to the date and topic of this discussion? Thanks Duf 06:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Alex large logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Alex large logo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright tags

Hi, I noticed you uploaded a couple of images including Image:Michael McDowell.jpg with seemingly contradictory license and copyright tags ({{No rights reserved}} copyright and "fairuse" license) and Image:Bishop Buckley.jpg (fairuse versus public domain). Can I ask you to confirm who owns the copyright on these images, and the exact method by which they released their rights? Thanks!

Demiurge 21:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also I noticed that Image:Bishop Buckley.jpg does not seem to have come from a press publicity kit, so that license tag is also invalid. Demiurge 21:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Any luck finding that information yet? If the copyright status on these images can't be confirmed, I'm afraid they'll have to be tagged for deletion. Demiurge 11:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dermot ahern.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dermot ahern.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Irish Clerical Child Sex Abusers listed for deletion

Just thought you should know, being the template's creator. Add your voice to the vote :) - Alison ^✍ 19:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - link to vote here - Alison ^✍ 19:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Forde

Hi. I looked at this article, which you wrote. You added this person to the category of 'convicted child sex offenders', and made veraious similar statements. Even a quick read of the article which you yourself cited as a reference reveals the fact that the victim was in her twenties at the time of the assault. This is not the sort of accuracy level we expect at Wikipedia, and might leave us open to accusation of libel. Please be more careful in the future. Thank you. DJ Clayworth 17:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo_brady.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo_brady.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ferns_coat_of_arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferns_coat_of_arms.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael McDowell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael McDowell.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 08:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Enda Kenny.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Enda Kenny.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 21:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pat Rabbitte.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pat Rabbitte.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 22:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Bailey (Irish politician)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article John Bailey (Irish politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bill Bulger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bill Bulger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bishop Buckley.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Bishop Buckley.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Archbishop Martin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Archbishop Martin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Light a Penny Candle.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Light a Penny Candle.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Bailey (Irish politician)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is John Bailey (Irish politician). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bailey (Irish politician). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Crimson Observer! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 334 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

John Buckley (bishop) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Patrick Masterson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Francis Joseph Charles O'Reilly - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Fidelma Macken - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Timothy O'Brien - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What Programme?

You referred to some programme in the Controversial seed capital section of the Irish Press entry without identifying what programme you were talking about, or what channel it was on. This requires explanation to resolve the mystery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.16.16.95 (talk) 03:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Brian McCracken/Comments

Talk:Brian McCracken/Comments, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Brian McCracken/Comments and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Brian McCracken/Comments during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 00:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Denis Brennan arms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Denis Brennan arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]