User talk:CrimsonLine

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 28 June 2005 21:30 (UTC)

Cuttyhunk

First off, thank you so much. You did a lot of work, and it really shows.

However, I feel I should ask one question: you only cited one source, and much of the language in your update feels a bit middle-of-last-century; is the update your wording or the book's? If the latter, it's not all that bad. I'd be happy to take some other references and re-work what you have into something that's not a direct derivative of any of them, but keeps the facts that you added.

Either way, thanks! -Harmil 30 June 2005 01:54 (UTC)

Cuttyhunk

Thanks for the compliments! I did use one written source (now way out of print), but also personal knowledge of the island for a lot of the article. I was not sure if I could source myself. I intend to update the page myself, drawing on some other web-based resources, but if you would like to edit it, that's great - I suppose that's what Wikipedia is all about.

I love Cuttyhunk, and wanted to make sure there was more than just a stub on Wikipedia.

I look forward to checking out your pages - it looks like you have an interest in Cuttyhunk and New Bedford, as do I. CrimsonLine June 30, 2005 02:19 (UTC)

Joseph in the Quran

Hi, first of all I'd like to acknowledge the hard work you put into making wikipedia a good accurate source of information for the whole world to see.

Just with regards to your last edit on the topic of the prophet Joseph in arabic literature (the Quran), I just wanted to clarify that the Quran is believed by every Muslim to be the word of God (Allah), therefore he is the rightful author of the book, which is revieled to the prophet Mohamed as a revalation by Gabriel. The prophet Mohamed was unable to be the writer of the book either, mainly due to his inability to read and write - hence why the Quran is believed by Muslims to be the prophet Mohamed's miracle.

Thank you very much for your patience and for listening - May God reward you for it.

- Hasooni 21:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand where you're coming from, Hasooni. The original text said that the quote was "according to Mohamed", the edit changed it to "according to Allah", and I realized that one was unacceptable to Muslims, while the other was unacceptable to non-Muslims. In order to create a Neutral Point of View, I simply changed the text to eliminate a reference to exactly who the author was. The question is incidental to the point of the paragraph.

CrimsonLine 20:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understood the change and its neutral perspective, thanks very much for that, but I just wanted to clarify the point to avoid a misconception of the religion and that's why I followed it up with a message to you. Thanks again :)

- Hasooni 23:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hugenberger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hugenberger.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

420 (cannabis culture)

Do you have a citation for your recent addition to the 420 article? "Cultural references" in the article must show an explicit connection to cannabis culture (or else the references do not fit criteria for inclusion). — Hiplibrarianship 13:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't. I was there, and it happened, but I don't have a reference. If those are the criteria, then it should be deleted. CrimsonLine 13:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]