User talk:Cricketgirl/Archive 2
Hello
[edit]Cool, cool. Feel free to take a look, it could have some lingering problems, who knows, and thanks for the congrats. Right now I am working on Black Hawk War (my next eventual FAC--these things can take awhile to get ready) and its related articles, most of which are linked from the main article. So far I have 5 GAs out of my work and a sixth awaiting review. My goal is to bring Black Hawk War to FA and all the battle and massacre and articles of that vein to GA, then take the whole thing to featured topic. Anyway, things are well. Hope things are well for you also. IvoShandor 07:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- User:IvoShandor/Black Hawk War, that page has links to everything, a charting of progress as well as subpages with articles to be created (which will need copy edited) and those that already existed or have already been created as part of my focus on this period in history. IvoShandor 07:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, today I do have a specific request. A GA reviewer has suggested that Battle of Wisconsin Heights be edited for grammar and flow. I copy edited it last night, before the comment, so I fear that as the author my eyes aren't the best ones for the job. If you have the time your assistance would be greatly appreciated. IvoShandor 20:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your assist with the article. For your efforts, you may feel like placing this on your user page.
- {{User Good Article|Battle of Wisconsin Heights}}
- Thanks again, someone will now learn themselves a little sumpin' from the interwebs. ;) IvoShandor 22:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
I see that IvoShandor's beat me to the punch - I came here to congratulate you on the copyedit and on getting Battle of Wisconsin Heights to GA status, and to leave you a copy of the userbox above. Nice to have people falling over themselves to thank you! You did an excellent job, though. Well done ;) EyeSereneTALK 22:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Hola
[edit]Hello non-wikibreakin' individual copy-editor person from across the wide sea. : )
IvoShandor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
IvoShandor 09:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not too bad. Yourself? And they are growing well, oddly enough (not that it matters) I am an atheist, somehow, though I fear the thought police coming along and changing everything to holiday tree. Speaking of Christmas trees, I may need your assistance as I move these articles along (I am on a semi-break, staying away from history and architecture for a bit, to relax my brain, the Black Hawk War was driving me mad). IvoShandor 10:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, many thanks for copyediting this article. I feel more confident in being able to take it to FAC once the Peer Review is over. → AA (talk) — 13:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thanks a lot for copyediting Bratislava. All the best. Tankred 19:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Heads up
[edit]Just a heads up, I may be sending a copy-edit request for Christmas tree cultivation your way for GA in the next couple days, with an eye for passive voice, which I am pretty good at eliminating so there may not be much to mop up when I get done. I will let you know, if you have the time, of course.IvoShandor 22:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think the article is ready for your assistance. Tear it up. ;) IvoShandor 17:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's cool, I looked at the diff between my last edit and yours, it all looks pretty good to me, nothing stood out as unreasonable as far as changes, nice work so far, you're an animal. The comments all made sense too, outside eyes are sometimes what it takes to notice these things. I will make appropriate changes while you are gone. IvoShandor 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- As I am making the changes here are a couple comments.
- I left a hidden comment about "real" vs. "natural", the problem is that "real" applies more specifically in the industry to trees sold that can be replanted for reuse in subsequent years. Is non-artificial better you think? If so, that change will be fine.
- Shear vs. shorn: I think both are acceptable, at least according to Webster's, is there a preference? Webster's seems to possibly indicate British English is shorn? Maybe?
- That's it, everything else is changed. Check out the new section heading for "Status". Better?
- IvoShandor 20:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- As I am making the changes here are a couple comments.
- That's cool, I looked at the diff between my last edit and yours, it all looks pretty good to me, nothing stood out as unreasonable as far as changes, nice work so far, you're an animal. The comments all made sense too, outside eyes are sometimes what it takes to notice these things. I will make appropriate changes while you are gone. IvoShandor 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the copy edit. It's great. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 02:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you for your help with this project! -- SECisek 07:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Someone else tagged it. I only listed it at "translations needed" after it was picked up as a possible copyvio at WP:SCV. Of course, de.wikipedia is GFDL, so I removed it from that list. Great to hear you'll be translating it. Thanks for your efforts! -- But|seriously|folks 23:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, I tagged it since I noticed in the edit summary that you're gonna translate it, but I didn't want someone who didn't see that to come along and speedy delete it in the meantime. Wl219 23:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Five more opera translations
[edit]Terrific, terrific! Delighted to see you back with us. Hope you had a good summer. Are you still in Oxford? Best. -- Kleinzach 02:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- I never understand about the pictures either. Let's try and port them over but if it doesn't work then we can leave them. I'll have a look. -- Kleinzach 13:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- They seem to be OK! -- Kleinzach 14:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
{{User Good Article|Christmas tree cultivation}}. Thank you for your contribution to the GA effort. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 02:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, Wassup, already got ya. Thanks for your work on this. You are always most helpful. Hope you learned a little something about Christmas tree farming, I know I did. I think I could start my own farm now if I had about 100 acres. IvoShandor 11:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Hi Cricketgirl! Thank you for copyediting the article about Eugenio Espejo. It passed the nomination and became a Good Article. —Dalobuca 20:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
In the Kaziranga National Park article u left with 2 notes to correct which i tried to attend. Can u please help with the first note. I have changed the sentence
- The administrative head of the park is the director and a divisional forest officer, a conservator-level officer.
to
- The administrative head of the park is the director, who is a divisional forest officer as well as conservator-level officer.
I actually want to mean that the "head of the park's designation or official name is known as Director, who is a divisional forest officer with the rank of conservator-level officer". Pls. help Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Quick request
[edit]A quick and fairly random request: I'm trying to finalise Brabham BT19 for FAC. A couple of other WP:F1 editors have commented that the rather full explanation of what Formula One is in the first para of the main text (section heading 'Concept') seems out of place. I'm looking for a couple of non-F1 fan editors to give me another point of view and thought of you since we recently crossed paths at Henri Toivonen and on the question of the meaning of 'Old nail'. Grateful if you could have a quick look. The sentence in question is 'Formula One is the highest form of single-seater racing defined by the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), motor sport's world governing body.'. Is that too much detail, or is it useful if one is new to the subject? Cheers. 4u1e 11:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Copyediting
[edit]Hi. I'm trying to get the Joey Barton article to FA status and I think it's close to getting it, but the prose could do with some work. Chensiyuan told me that you're good at copyediting articles so I was hoping that when you get a chance you'd be able to do it. It would be very much appreciated. Sir-Nobby 15:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for doing that. I'm not sure about the new sections because I was basing the layout on Gilberto Silva's, but I'll try to make some of the terms in the Style of Play section clearer where you've left notes. The prose is looking a lot more professional now. Thanks again. Sir-Nobby 17:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
More opera translations
[edit]Thanks for Aribert Reimann and Johann André. Both very good. And yes, please do any of the people listed in "Can You Translate" line on the project page? There's no priority so please do the ones that interest you. They are a mixture of some serious, obscure figures and some popular operetta composers, some German, some Viennese. Best. -- Kleinzach 23:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the copyedit request.....i'll go through the article and the section Murree hills culture and see what can be done.....I'll let you know if i need anything....thanks for asking.Gprince007 16:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've copyedited the Murree hills culture in the Murree article. If possible please take a look at it and give me a feedback. I think we can move it to proofread section.Gprince007 09:36, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Help needed not of the urgent variety
[edit]Hi there -- first, thanks for proof-reading the Shareef Abdur-Rahim article. Well, I'm a member of the NBA Wikiproject and while we've got a bunch of FAs and GAs, some of them could do with some further copyediting. If you're free/interested, the Toronto Raptors (an FA) and the Tim Duncan (an FAC) articles in particular could do with some copyediting. Of course, this is a somewhat random (albeit genuine) solicitation for help, of which refusal is a completely legitimate and understandable response. Thanks. Chensiyuan 07:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi there, got your message. Thanks for the help. Looking forward to the improved articles; there's no real hurry at all. Chensiyuan 23:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
It was really kind of you to help; please accept this barnstar :) Chensiyuan 11:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Hi again. Thierry Henry is a GA, and a possible FAC in the near future. Any copyediting help would be appreciated, although I can't stress enough that there's absolutely no obligation! Please do keep this at the bottom of your priority list. I'm just sounding out here because placing a request on LOCE can take half a year for a response! Chensiyuan 13:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello again. I was wondering if you could look over the article on the British electronic music group Goldfrapp. Thanks. -- Underneath-it-All 20:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Yet another request
[edit]I hate to bombard you with yet another request, considering the amount of work you have done at my behest, but I am going to submit Battle of Horseshoe Bend (1832) to GAC tonight and wondered if you might give it a copy edit. I figured may as well be pre-emptive as the standards at GA seem to be tightening up a bit lately. IvoShandor 08:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- May as well add Battle of Apple River Fort to the request, also at GAC. IvoShandor 11:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
F1 BT19 etc
[edit]Ta very much. As Sandy's the only one who has found that bit even vaguely useful I guess it will go. Cheers. 4u1e 10:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
It's long ago
[edit]Sir, I nominated the article Ayyavazhi for to be copy-edited in the january of this year. And now it is there for more than seven months still didn't get done. So please don't make delay of or don't make it to remain as it is. I, though can write english, can't make it great and grammatically perfect. So pls help; I was in a move to nominate it for a FA candidate. So one again pls help and also if can pls make some others too to know aboaut it and to help. Thanks - Paul Raj 11:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Wagner family
[edit]I wonder if you have time to look at this one: Wagner Family Tree? This is for the Wagner Project - we are working articles about various members of the family and having the tree in English would be very useful. Thanks. -- Kleinzach 23:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've been offline for a couple of days. I looked on your sandbox page but didn't find it. Have you moved it somewhere? Best, -- Kleinzach 06:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Now I've found it. Looks fine. We can keep it in the same format as the German page, at least for the time being. Someone may do something more elaborate with it later. Thanks for your help. -- Kleinzach 08:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I see Bodo Lafferentz was an officer in the SS [1] although he is described in the Wagner family tree as a 'Doctor of Political Science'. Has the German version been a bit sanitized? What do you think? -- Kleinzach 00:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, maybe translating the BL article would be a good idea. If we find this material interesting then maybe other people will as well. Perhaps the Volkswagen stuff is also worth whiile? We could also add BL to the List of SS personnel? There doesn't seem to be anything about his de-nazification unfortunately. -- Kleinzach 22:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thnaks. Very interesting material. I've added a few cats/links and changed the designation in the Wagner family tree. Hope that is OK. -- Kleinzach 23:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Copyedit request
[edit]I'm hopful that I can make this a FAC within the next week or so. Thanks in advance. Buc 20:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
re LoCE template image
[edit]I've made a quick-fix (see LoCE talk page). EyeSereneTALK 10:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thierry Henry
[edit]HI, thanks for the copyedit. I'd look into the links ASAP (that's why I never dared nom it for FAC). Thanks again! Chensiyuan 15:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, you didn't cause me any work at all. It was necessary to clean up the article and quite frankly it's the first time I've seen so many dead links. But it's a lesson learned so it's all good. Cheers. Chensiyuan 13:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
GA noms
[edit]I have attempted to address your comments on Battle of Apple River Fort and Battle of Horseshoe Bend (1832). I think furore must be British English, I am not sure I recognize it. There are some comments on Applr River Fort, I think there may still be some outstanding issues there, please do take a look if you have time. If the first section rewording is okay, then Horseshoe Bend should be okay. Take a look there too, though, if you have time. Thanks for the thorough copy edit, btw, your help is, as always, greatly appreciated. Thanks. IvoShandor 10:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I further reworded the "Background" sections, as I said, they still did not feel right to me. If you could take a look again, to make sure I didn't screw it up, it would be appreciated. I might not have mentioned, I am looking for the info on where the "express" destination was. I remember reading it was Dixon or Dixon's Ferry but I can't remember where, I will try to pull it up. You think everything else is good? Anything you notice at a glance that still needs work? IvoShandor 21:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, force is redundant. Though I would note that Illinois Militia is a proper noun, the group is now known as the Illinois National Guard. IvoShandor 00:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: Twinkle
[edit]No problem. Even though it is very powerful, don't be afraid of Twinkle! It is one of the most valuable tools on Wikipedia. Keep up the vandal-reverting! =) NASCAR Fan24(talk•contribs) 15:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Wilhelm Kienzl and August Bungert and other translations
[edit]Thanks for these - good solid information. Don't worry about polishing them up as I can do that. Best. -- Kleinzach 00:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message you just sent. I can probably supply you with as much matertial as you want! There really is a lot of good opera and music material on the German Wiki. (For example there is a big job available on the Wiener Staatsoper article which is only one third of the length of the German one [2].) But maybe it's best if we build the work around your special interests? For example we could concentrate on a place or a period. We could do followup works on say Kienzl's operas or whatever. So please let me know your preferences and I'll see what I can come up with. -- Kleinzach 00:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've added five contemporary singers to the list, including the very deserving Polaski (Berlin-based and rather overlooked by the Met, hence the German rather than English article). See how you get on with them. There are lots more . . . . -- Kleinzach 01:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Great material. I have done some editing and I have some questions; 1. I don't understand the references to a quarrel with Grabbe in the 3rd para. Any ideas? 2. The 5th para seems to jump from 'his first comic opera' (which is it?) to 'Zar und Zimmermann' Is there something missing? Best. -- Kleinzach 00:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Incidentally - in connection with Lortzing - I wonder if it's worth translating Spieloper? -- Kleinzach 00:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you again - and for your comments on my page. I've now finished going through Lortzing, Spieloper and Heinrich Strecker. All really useful stuff! Best. Simon -- Kleinzach 02:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for going over the Goldfrapp article! :) -- Underneath-it-All 01:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)