User talk:Crewcamel
June 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:UEFA Euro 2012 Group A. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Tim O'Brien (author) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tim O'Brien (author) was changed by Crewcamel (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953112 on 2013-05-13T19:05:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:United States presidential election, 2020 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Confusing post at Talk:Czech Republic
[edit]In this note, you "OPPOSE" the "RFC: 6-month moratorium on page-name and related discussions)" but your explanation suggests you are instead only opposing the changing of the article-name at this time, which a topic that is not up for debate in this section. Could you clarify your position on the RFC, if this is what you wish to oppose (or support, or whatever)? DMacks (talk) 02:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Talk:United States presidential election, 2020, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 02:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Jim1138 (talk) 04:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't remove them. I put them in an archive. And i specifically chose discussions that were either resolved, or old. The page was way too long
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Rami R 05:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)- You have been told to drop it, and yet you persisted. In the future discuss your edits first and do not edit-war. Rami R 05:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
unblock
[edit]
Crewcamel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This talk page is too long. Im trying to help it by taking all the resolved and abandoned discussions and putting them in an archive. Im doing my best to very carefully explain my reasoning when making the edits but they keep being reverted. I would normally try to discuss this first with the editors but i know it won't go anywhere. These people had Lady Gaga and Katy Perry as presidential candidates for an entire month because they didn't feel it was worth changing it. I know first hand that no amount of discussion is going to convince them that George Clooney or Oprah do not need mentioning in this article. That's why im trying to clean up the talk page myself, b/c they're never going to. Go look at it. It looks like vomit. They have an archivebot too but it's clearly not moving fast enough. I dont expect this to get my ban reverted (it's only 12 hours) but im going to continue to try to get my edits through. Crewcamel (talk) 06:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You *do not* edit war, period. And if you think refusing to discuss things because "i know it won't go anywhere" is an acceptable approach, I strongly recommend you think again before you make any further edits. And as for "im going to continue to try to get my edits through", *do not* try to force them through, because if you do you will face escalating blocks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please don't keep starting new sections at Talk:United States presidential election, 2020 about the archivebot thing, as it makes the discussion very hard to follow (and it was you complaining that the talk page is hard to follow, wasn't it? ;-). I've moved the new one you started yesterday (which I've only just noticed) up into the original section, so please let's keep the discussion all in one place. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- oops
May 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm PackMecEng. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:United States presidential election, 2020 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PackMecEng (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)