User talk:Crescendo102

This is Crescendo102's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crescendo102! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Phillips (Sculptor) (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft needs additional citations for the education and awards sections. Within Wikipedia, references are supposed to refer to sources that can be used to verify an article's contents – what you have done is basically create references to show that Phillips' works have been on display somewhere. This is totally acceptable, but sources for other sections must not be omitted. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Phillips (Sculptor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Phillips (Sculptor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Phillips (Sculptor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Phillips (Sculptor). Thanks! Zippybonzo | talk 06:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mentor,

Could you please help me with the submission of the new page for sculptor David Phillips?

It was rejected again, this time apparently for reasons tied to the “quality and reliability of sources.” Since you had suggested that I add new references in the education section, I added references of Cranbrook Academy, the New England Conservatory of Music, State of Utah, and also the Christian Science Monitor, the Boston Globe, and the Art Net Magazine, all reliable secondary sources of good reputation and totally independent from the well-known artist David Phillips.

Besides, in addition to the articles above in the Boston Globe and other publications, I added a few more references on his artwork, such as the Mel Lederman Memorial Foundation (private website), Landscape Notes (sourced in partnership with MIT and Harvard), and some blogs that perhaps are not strong enough references, in which case we could remove them, of course.

On another note, I did not include an article from the AP News Agency that mentions David Phillips as the sculptor retained by the Boston Museum of Science to design and build the future Leonard Nimoy memorial with a 20-foot sculpture shaped like Mr. Spock’s split-fingered hand, because I thought this is just an ongoing project for now (Please see article from a CBS station here: https://www.wkyt.com/2021/03/26/live-long-in-sculpture-20-foot-art-planned-for-spock-symbol/)

Likewise, I omitted the publication from the Animal League of Boston regarding the work they commissioned David Phillips for (see reference here: http://www.arlboston.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Donor-and-artist-profile-release_15-5-22.pdf). This sculpture is already referenced in Wikidata and I could add a picture to that page if appropriate (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q109272102).

Other existing references include an article from the Boston Herald that I omitted since access is reserved to subscribers as is often the case with news/media outlets/websites (here it is: https://www.bostonherald.com/2013/05/29/his-pet-project-ex-teacher-donates-animal-sculpture-to-boston/)

Again, I am happy to edit further under your guidance to complete this page and publish it according to the very essence of Wikipedia practice.

Thank you very much for your help.

Kind regards, Crescendo102 (talk) 00:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Phillips (Sculptor) (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Phillips (Sculptor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Phillips (Sculptor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Crescendo102/sandbox

Hello, Crescendo102. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Crescendo102/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Le Gac has been accepted

Jean Le Gac, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone, thank you for your help with the pages I created. Based on your note above that "you can now create articles yourself without posting a request," do you think I can publish the new page I created for artist Bertrand Lavier? Or should I simply wait for someone to review it since the page is already in the "pipeline" for review? Crescendo102 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Jean Le Gac, I've accepted it as he is a very well known conceptual artist, and the article sourcing shows this is the case. The article can be improved - as it is it reads like a resume or CV, simply listing his exhibitions. This section should be developed and rewritten as prose content in an encyclopedic style. I've also taken the liberty to move the largely unsourced and unneccessary Bibliography section to the article talk page. Perhaps 3 or so of the most important (and sourced) entries can be added back to the article - a Further reading section could be added below the references for this purpose. Also the 1986 public art work needs a citation. Thanks again for the article! Let me know if you have any questions. Netherzone (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your guidance.

I just completed a redone Jean Le Gac wiki page section and published it. I hope this works and I will continue to improve it in the future.

Best regards, Crescendo102 (talk) 21:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Crescendo102. Thank you for creating David Phillips (Sculptor). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Crescendo102/sandbox

Hello, Crescendo102. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bertrand Lavier has been accepted

Bertrand Lavier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bertrand Lavier

Hi @Crescendo102: I've done a wee bit of work to copyedit the article, changed the section to standardise them a bit per WP:MOS I notice it doesn't have a biographical section of his life, for example his family and career, where he was educated as soon on, covering his whole life. This section is really needed. Can you add it in. It needs a full career section. scope_creep^Talk 08:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind help. I looked for biographical and personal information such as family, education, career, etc. but I could not find any from reliable Wikipedia-compliant sources. The artist must be a very private person. Nevertheless, I will continue searching for that information. Crescendo102 (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Approve article

Hi Crescendo102, I've just put an article about an kosovar professional Taekwondo athlète, but I can't publish it. Can you publish it for me ? All is done.

The draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Arbnor_Bajra

The article in French version (it s published): https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbnor_Bajra

Haver a good day, Afrim J. AfrimSport1 (talk) 09:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Takao Ogawa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Takao Ogawa. Thanks! Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takao Ogawa has been accepted

Takao Ogawa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Miles Davis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 21:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samf4u, thank you for your kind help. I am reverting back to page #238 which happens to be the exact page where the citation by Miles Davis appears in the book referenced in the article: "Miles Speaks - Everything That Miles Told" and removing the previous page numbers that referred to Miles paintings only.

Page #238 is more relevant to the reader and can be found in this book here:

https://www.kawade.co.jp/np/isbn/9784309277707/ Crescendo102 (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]