User talk:Creeperdan

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anna Jay

The article Anna Jay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 19:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hi Creeperdan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Big Swole that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 04:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Jay

Hey there, Creeperdan! It feels odd to ask you not to add original research to an article you created, but I'm going to do it anyway. In addition, please read Help:Minor edit, as I suggested above, and WP:PW/RS to get a sense of which professional wrestling sources are reliable. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 16:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits again

Hi Creeperdan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Britt Baker that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 03:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of living persons

Please do not add content which gives undue weight to some statement about a living person, as you did at Daniel Garcia (American wrestler). On Wikipedia we take particular care over articles about living people.

New information, even if referenced, should be added only if noteworthy, relevant and documented in multiple reliable third-party sources. Wikipedia is not a newspaper and material should not be added if it is only gossip or has little longer-term importance, or if the only sourcing is tabloid journalism.

If challenged, the onus is on the editor who adds the content to justify its retention. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 02:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleJoan Hi! What I don't understand is that the sources I used information from is from a reliable source being 'cagematch.net' and I did add relevant information (with references) for example his first wrestling match was in 2017 when you said his debut was in the following year, and as for 'undue weight' I really don't think what I wrote was too heavy or irrelevant but if that's your opinion then alright then? At the end of the day it is your article and you can control wht comes in and out but it is frustrating when you removing all this information that I have researched. - Hope you can get back to me- Creeperdan

I've removed the debut year, which was unsourced.

That aside, you wrote Garcia made his wrestling debut on February 18, 2017. Cagematch does not say this, and even if it did, WP:PW/RS says it is only reliable for match results. Cagematch listing the date as the first match known to them as Garcia's first does not verify the date as his debut, so that material fails WP:V (and most likely WP:OR). You wrote he returned to AEW in May 2021 and picked up his first AEW win in August 2021. The source says neither of those things. Regarding undue weight, Cagematch lists 196 matches that Garcia has had. I'm guessing the reasoning behind the four that you chose to include is your personal knowledge of what each of the four means for Garcia's career, which is a violation of the WP:NPOV policy. Hope that's clear. KyleJoan^talk 16:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleJoan Oh okay thanks for clearing that up for me - Just want to add though that although the sources don't specifically say he returned to AEW but it is pretty obvious that he did if you look at his professional wrestling career and also assuming you watch AEW you would know this but I could be wrong. I'll leave you with his article from now on since I honestly don't know if you like contributions lol - Thanks for making things clear though -Creeperdan

Something being pretty obvious does not make it verifiable. Please carefully read through the three policies linked above. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 02:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits again (again)

This is not a minor edit. Please be more careful next time. KyleJoan^talk 18:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Anna Jay

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anna Jay. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. KyleJoan^talk 01:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Colombian female professional wrestlers

A tag has been placed on Category:Colombian female professional wrestlers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROSELINE

Hello, Creeperdan. Thanks for your contribution on the Jade Cargill article. However, I recommend to read WP:PROSELINE. Most of the pro wrestling articles have the same problem, the prose it's something line on DATE, at EVENT something happened. So, it's better to write in a more summarized, natural way. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AQA (wrestler)

Hello, Creeperdan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slywriter, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, AQA (wrestler), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slywriter (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruby Soho

Hello. As I said before, some of your editions don't meet some guidelines. WP:PROSELINE, avoid to include things like "On day X, she won. On day Y, she was defeated". Also, our Style guide states that "Summarize the major events and key points of the wrestler's career. Avoid writing in proseline ("week-by-week" format)." I don't see how weekly matches are major events of her career, even when she was defeated in the finals. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid writing in proseline ("week-by-week" format)

Please don't add unnecessary dates like what you did[1] to Jamie Hayter. Read both WP:PROSELINE and WP:PW/BIO: Summarize the major events and key points of the wrestler's career. Avoid writing in proseline ("week-by-week" format) and adding excessive details. --Mann Mann (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Danish female professional wrestlers

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish female professional wrestlers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shazza McKenzie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shazza McKenzie, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shazza McKenzie (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not under any circumstances remove an AfD template from an article as you did here. If you wish to retain the article you should participate in the discussion at the link given where a consensus will be found. Addicted4517 (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]