User talk:Creedab

Removal of content

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Blackburn Rovers F.C.. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Blackburn Rovers F.C.. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Blackburn Rovers F.C., you will be blocked from editing. ~ Troy (talk) 19:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Blackburn Rovers F.C., you will be blocked from editing. ~ Troy (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think your edits at Talk:Blackburn Rovers F.C. are being reverted because the editors disagree with the order of the rivals, rather because it is a removal of content. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Blackburn Rovers F.C., you will be blocked from editing. --Muchness (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Blackburn Rovers F.C.. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Muchness (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Brfc97 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

August 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tan ǀ 39 20:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 20:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]