User talk:CreatorWiki

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, CreatorWiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Syrthiss (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and I have reverted your edits to User:The Anome. In general, its poor wikiquette to edit other user's userpages. If he wishes to use your template, he can add it himself. Thanks! Syrthiss (talk) 13:23, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and to another user's page. Please stop. Syrthiss (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User Blocked

Template:User Blocked has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bencherlite ^Talk 08:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have also nominated {{IP Blocked}} as well, at the same place. Bencherlite ^Talk 08:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:Usergroups

Template:Usergroups, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Usergroups and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Usergroups during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bencherlite ^Talk 09:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Sims 3 Master Suite

A tag has been placed on The Sims 3 Master Suite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 12:01, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sims 3 patch list

I would like to know why you feel the need to place an unnecessarily long list of patches that excessively lengthens the The Sims 3 article. It is just a long list of numbers that is of no use to the reader and adds irrelevant information. I do not want to revert again so as not to potentially start an edit war but I would like to know a good reason for why you feel this is necessary. One thing you should not have done is put it back on the article without putting a message on the discussion board first to see if others actually want an excessive list on the article, which has a lot of irrelevant information already. Please reply within the next 12 hours or I will be inclined to remove your additions. Thanks, Cadiomals (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have given you about 12 hours to reply to my message and since you have not I am removing your excessively long, non-encyclopedic list. Please do not put back your edits without placing a message on the discussion page first, saying why exactly this excessively long, useless, irrelevant, non-encyclopedic list should be included within the article. WIkipedia has guides on how and when to use lists on articles. Wikipedia is also not a catalog or directory for finding ultra-specific information such as what you included. Once again, please don't re-add your edits without consulting the talk page first. The Sims 3 article must remain as relevant and encyclopedic as possible. Right now it is already full of useless trivia that could stand being removed. Thank you, Cadiomals (talk) 03:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Sims 3/Versions to install EPs

The article The Sims 3/Versions to install EPs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --MuZemike 22:06, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP policy

Based on all your contributions you seem to have a poor understanding of Wikipedia policy. Please read carefully WP:NOT, WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:VGSCOPE to gain a better understanding of what does and does not belong in the Sims articles. I doubt you are trying to vandalize and I'm sure you wish to make these articles better, but unfortunately you are not, and at the same time violating policy. if you have any questions please let me know or see WP:HELP. I do not wish for our relationship to be hostile so please understand what I'm trying to do here. Cadiomals (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit war

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Sims 3. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not edit war be reverting my edits. If you have a problem you MUST discuss it on the talk page, but do not revert. My edits were far from vandalism so I'm giving you one warning as you have never made a constructive contribution to Wikipedia. I suggest you reply to my message to you above. - Cadiomals (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at The Sims 3, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Zach Vega (talk) 22:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi. You appear to be trying to engage in an edit war. Cadiomals (talk · contribs) has made a good faith attempt to explain his edits to you and you have just reverted him without comment or called his edits vandalism. The only thing that you will achieve through this is getting yourself blocked. I have once again restorred Cadiomals' edit, please use the talk page on the article, your talk page or Cadiomals talk page to settle your displute. Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Sims 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dude, really? Zach Vega (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Street view

Hi , the update of the street view images have been updated in Argentina and Colombia too ; and that update was in December 15th of 2017 😉. Thanks Jkmilo13 (talk) 03:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't wipe latest imagery chart for google street view

It is to be updated, not removed. Alex of Canada (talk) 17:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I left blank for users to re-fill the column, I re-filled some, but the other editors could re-fill as well. CreatorWiki (talk) 02:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was still no reason to completely blank it. Many pages need to be updated, doesn't mean we wipe the whole thing. Alex of Canada (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page needs to be updated so that the blank column is filled with dates again, and I'm hoping that the editors will re-fill the column with dates of the latest imagery. CreatorWiki (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CreatorWiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CreatorWiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]